The Tenth Circuit on Thursday issued one published opinion and four unpublished opinions.
Published
In United States v. Washington, the Court reversed the district court’s denial of Petitioner’s motions to vacate, correct, or set aside his sentence. Petitioner claimed that his counsel was constitutionally deficient in defending him from charges of possession of cocaine and carrying a firearm in connection with a crime. The Court agreed, finding that Petitioner’s “counsel’s failure to understand the basic mechanics of the sentencing guidelines and, in particular, his failure to advise [Petitioner] regarding the impact of relevant conduct on his potential sentence prior to meeting with the probation officer, amounted to constitutionally deficient performance under Strickland v. Washington.”
Unpublished







