May 24, 2013

Tenth Circuit: Opinions, 10/5/10

The Tenth Circuit on Tuesday issued one published opinion and three unpublished opinions.

Published

In Dallakoti v. Holder, Jr., the Court affirmed the district court’s denial of Petitioner’s application for asylum. Petitioner, a native of Nepal, claimed that he was persecuted by the Maoists because he was a successful businessman and of his and his family’s political opinions. However, there was no compelling evidence to support his contentions, and therefore the immigration judges’s decision was affirmed.

Unpublished

Marshall v. Estep

United States v. Pickard

Weedman v. Hartley

No Colorado Supreme Court Opinions: Week of October 3, 2010

There are no new cases to report.

Colorado Division of Labor to Hold Rulemaking Hearing on Minimum Wage

A proposed amendment to the Code of Colorado Regulations (CCR) regarding Colorado’s minimum wage is the subject of a public hearing slated for early November.

The Colorado Department of Labor & Employment’s Division of Labor (DOL) invites public comment on the measure being considered for addition to 7 CCR 1103-1,”Colorado Minimum Wage Order,” that will bring the CCR in line with the state minimum wage pursuant to the Colorado Constitution. Colorado’s minimum wage of $7.24 per hour went into effect January 1, 2010, and will increase again to $7.36 per hour on January 1, 2011. A redline showing all proposed changes is available here.

Interested parties are encouraged to attend the rulemaking hearing on Friday, November 5, on the second floor of the DOL office, located in Downtown Denver at 633 17th Street. The hearing is scheduled to begin at 2:00 p.m.

For more information, contact Amanda Neal at the DOL, (303) 318-8460.

Internal Revenue Service to Provide Relief to Homeowners with Corrosive Damage Due to Toxic Imported Drywall

The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) is offering relief to taxpayers who have incurred property loss caused by the presence of toxic imported drywall that was installed in their homes between 2001 and 2009.

Revenue Procedure 2010-36 (pdf) enables qualified taxpayers to claim as a casualty loss any damage to homes and provides a “safe harbor” method for calculating the loss amount.

Eligible corrosive drywall must be identified by a two-step process described by the U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development: first, there must be visual evidence of blackened copper electrical coilings and/or air conditioning evaporator coils; and second, the drywall must have been installed between 2001 and 2009. Additional corroboration of the property’s eligibility for special tax treatment will follow when these two criteria have been met.

According to an IRS news release, the revisions provide:

  • Individuals who pay to repair damage to their personal residences or household appliances resulting from corrosive drywall may treat the amount paid as a casualty loss in the year of payment.
  • Taxpayers who have already filed their income tax return for the year of payment generally have three years to file an amended return and claim the deduction.The amount of a loss that may be claimed depends on whether the taxpayer has a pending claim for reimbursement (or intends to pursue reimbursement) of the loss through property insurance, litigation or otherwise.
  • In cases where a taxpayer does not have a pending claim for reimbursement, the taxpayer may claim as a loss all unreimbursed amounts paid during the taxable year to repair damage to the taxpayer’s personal residence and household appliances resulting from corrosive drywall.
  • If a taxpayer does have a pending claim (or intends to pursue reimbursement), a taxpayer may claim a loss for 75 percent of the unreimbursed amount paid during the taxable year to repair damage to the taxpayer’s personal residence and household appliances that resulted from corrosive drywall.

Homeowners who suspect they have corrosive drywall should file a report with the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission by calling (800) 638-2772 or visiting www.cpsc.gov/cgibin/drywall.aspx.

The issue of toxic imported drywall, typically of Chinese manufacture, came light in 2009 amidst widespread reports of electrical failure, sulphuric fumes emissions, and respiratory problems experienced by owners of newly built homes constructed during last decade’s housing boom.

(image source: Wikimedia Commons)

Protected

2013-05-24 03:28:06