May 25, 2013

SB 11-190: Modifying State Department Performance and Accountability Reports to Be Citizen-Centric

On March 10, 2011, Sen. Irene Aguilar, D-Denver, and Rep. Lois Court, D-Denver, introduced SB 11-190 – Concerning increased transparency of state government through annual citizen-centric performance and accountability reports by departments. This summary is published here courtesy of the Colorado Bar Association’s e-Legislative Report.

The “State Measurement for Accountable, Responsive, and Transparent (SMART) Government Act” requires each department to prepare a 4-page annual performance report. The bill modifies the report to be a citizen-centric performance and accountability report by:

  • Requiring specific information on each page of the report;
  • Requiring a brief table of contents and information about the department, the population served by the department, financial data, costs for services provided, and the department’s anticipated future challenges; and
  • Requiring the office of state planning and budgeting and the departments that create their own reports to design the report to maximize its visual appeal and readability.

Assigned to State, Veterans & Military Affairs Committee; the bill is scheduled for committee review on Monday, March 21 at 1:30 pm.

Since this summary, the bill was postponed indefinitely.

Summaries of other featured bills can be found here.

SB 11-187: Implementing the Recommendations of the Sunset Review and Report on State-Regulated Mental Health Professionals

On March 10, 2011, Sen. Linda Newell, D-Littleton, and Rep. Rhonda Fields, D-Aurora, introduced SB 11-187 – Concerning the continuation of the regulation of mental health professionals, and, in connection therewith, continuing the state boards of psychologist examiners, social work examiners, marriage and family therapist examiners, and licensed professional counselor examiners and the state grievance board, creating the state board of addiction counselor examiners, and implementing the recommendations contained in the sunset review and report of state-regulated mental health professionals. This summary is published here courtesy of the Colorado Bar Association’s e-Legislative Report.

Sunset Process – Senate Health and Human Services Committee. The bill implements the recommendations of the sunset review and report on state-regulated mental health professionals.
The bill continues the boards of psychologist examiners, social work examiners, marriage and family therapist examiners, and licensed professional counselor examiners and the state grievance board, and the regulation of psychologists, social workers, marriage and family therapists, licensed professional counselors, psychotherapists, and addiction counselors through September 1, 2020.

The bill defines terms relevant to the practice of addiction counseling.

The bill creates the state board of addiction counselor examiners to regulate addiction counselors, thereby eliminating the authority of the director of the division of registrations to regulate addiction counselors.

The bill continues indefinitely the ability of the oversight boards to issue a provisional license to a candidate for a mental health professional license or certification if the candidate has satisfied the education requirements for a license or certification but has not yet satisfied the experience requirements. The bill also adds the newly created state board of addiction counselor examiners to the definition of “board”, changes the name of “unlicensed psychotherapists” to “registered psychotherapists” in recognition of the fact that psychotherapists are required to register with, and are regulated by, the state grievance board, repeals unnecessary definitions, and makes other technical modifications to definitions.

The bill creates a registry for marriage and family therapy and licensed professional counselor licensure candidates who are working toward full licensure, consistent with candidate registries currently available for psychologist, social worker, and addiction counselor licensure candidates. The sections also permit the regulatory boards for marriage and family therapists and licensed professional counselors to administer computer-based examinations to determine an applicant’s competency in the particular practice area.

The bill repeals a duplicate definition of “psychotherapy” to avoid confusion with another broader definition of that term in another provision of the article and repeals the definition of “unlicensed psychotherapist” to comport with the change, per section 7 of the bill, to “registered psychotherapists.”

The bill makes further, conforming changes related to the name change for psychotherapists and allows the state grievance board to administer on-line examinations to psychotherapists applying for registration.

The bill permits the oversight boards for psychologists and social workers to establish computer-based jurisprudence examinations for license, certification, or registration applicants to increase efficiency in the administration of examinations. These sections also contain technical corrections to the statutes as recommended in the sunset report.

The bill amends the statute outlining activities that are prohibited for persons regulated under the act as follows:

  • Eliminates the requirement that a person who has been convicted of a felony can be disciplined only if the felony relates to the ability to practice the person’s mental health profession;
  • Restates the grounds for discipline regarding use or abuse of alcohol or drugs to eliminate the term “intemperate”;
  • Eliminates the ability of a board to discipline a licensee, registrant, or certificate holder simply for having a mental or physical illness or condition that impairs the person’s ability to practice his or her profession and instead allows the applicable board to discipline the licensee, registrant, or certificate holder for failing to notify the board of the limitation, failing to act within the limitations of the illness or condition, or failing to comply with the conditions in a confidential agreement with the board related to the person’s mental or physical illness or condition;
  • For purposes of determining whether a person has acted or failed to act in a manner consistent with generally accepted standards of the professional discipline under which the person practices, adds a reference to the standards of practice generally recognized by state and national associations of practitioners in the field of the person’s professional discipline;
  • Narrows the prohibition against dual relationships to prohibit a mental health professional from maintaining relationships with clients in cases where the person’s professional judgment was impaired or the person exploited the client;
  • Eliminates the requirement that repeated ordering of unnecessary laboratory tests or studies must be willful in order to be grounds for disciplining the person; and
  • Adds as a ground for discipline the failure to respond to a complaint.

The bill authorizes the oversight boards to impose an administrative fine on a licensee, registrant, or certificate holder who violates an administrative requirement of the statutes or rules. The boards are required to adopt rules setting up a schedule of fines, and the administrative fines cannot exceed $5,000 per violation.

The bill authorizes the oversight boards to enter into confidential agreements to restrict the practice of a licensee, registrant, or certificate holder who has a mental or physical illness or condition that affects his or her ability to practice the profession with reasonable skill and safety to clients.

The bill modifies the membership on the oversight boards to eliminate one public member on each board and replace that member with a person engaged in or authorized to practice the particular profession. The bill also permits the state board of social work examiners, on its own or at the request of a licensee, to appoint advisory committees to assist with the operations of the board.

The bill modifies the definitions of “practice of psychology”, “practice of licensed professional counseling”, and “practice of addiction counseling”, respectively, to conform to model practice act language adopted by the applicable national professional associations.

The bill adds counseling to the list of permissible practices of a social worker.

The bill recodifies laws pertaining to the licensure and certification of addiction counselors to specify qualifications for licensure as an addiction counselor and certification as either a level I, II, or III certified addiction counselor and the particular activities in which addiction counselors are permitted to engage based on whether the addiction counselor is licensed or has a level I, II, or III certification.
Assigned to the Health and Human Services Committee; the bill is scheduled for committee review on Wednesday, March 23, Upon Adjournment.

Summaries of other featured bills can be found here.

SB 11-186: Permitting Any Judicial District to Establish an Alternative Bond Program

On March 7, 2011, Sen. John Morse, D-Colorado Springs, and Rep. Mark Waller, R-Colorado Springs, introduced SB 11-186 – Concerning the establishment of an alternative bond program. This summary is published here courtesy of the Colorado Bar Association’s e-Legislative Report.

The bill permits an alternative bond program to be established in any judicial district. A court is allowed to provide the option of the alternative bond program to a defendant if there is such a program in that judicial district. A law enforcement agency may work with an alternative bond program to secure the appearance of defendants in the program. A pretrial services program with an alternative bond program is permitted to expend a portion of the moneys collected for pretrial services. On March 9, the Judiciary Committee referred the unamended bill to the Appropriations Committee.

Summaries of other featured bills can be found here.

SB 11-185: Requiring State Contracts between Government and Vendor to Include Clause to Provide Notice of Outsourcing

On March 3, 2011, Sen. Mike Johnston, D-Denver, introduced SB 11-185 – Concerning a clause in state contracts that requires a vendor to notify the state if the vendor outsources duties performed pursuant to the contract to a locale outside the United States. This summary is published here courtesy of the Colorado Bar Association’s e-Legislative Report.

The bill requires state contracts between a governmental body and a vendor with a value of $250,000 or more to contain a clause that would require any vendor who outsources duties performed pursuant to the contract to a locale outside the United States to notify the executive director of the department of personnel of such outsourcing. The notice must include the specific duties outsourced and the reason the duties were outsourced. The executive director is required to post the notice on the official web site of the department. If a vendor fails to notify the executive director of outsourcing, the contract, at the governmental body’s discretion, may be voided, and the vendor is subject to a fine equal to 1% of the total price of the contract. Assigned to the Local Government Committee; the bill is scheduled for committee review on Tuesday, March 22 at 2:00 p.m.

Summaries of other featured bills can be found here.

Colorado Court of Appeals: Week of March 20, 2011 (No Published Opinions)

The Colorado Court of Appeals issued no published opinions and 47 unpublished opinions for the week of March 20, 2011.

Neither State Judicial nor the Colorado Bar Association provides case summaries for unpublished appellate opinions. Case announcements are available here.

 

Tenth Circuit: Opinions, 3/23/11

The Tenth Circuit on Wednesday issued one published opinion and nine unpublished opinions.

Published

In United States v. Washington, Sr., the Court affirmed the district court’s decision and sentence. Petitioner was convicted of wire fraud and commercial carrier fraud; he claims that the evidence was insufficient on the commercial carrier fraud count because use of the carrier was not essential to the scheme, and that his sentence was improperly increased. The Court found that for commercial carrier fraud to be actionable, “the use of the mails need not be an essential element of the scheme. It is sufficient for the mailing to be incident to an essential part of the scheme or a step in the plot.” Additionally, the district court did not err in calculating the loss amount, impacting Petitioner’s sentence, because the losses were foreseeable to Petitioner given his experience in the industry.

Unpublished

United States v. Barcelo-Picaso

United States v. Rocha-Rodriguez

Boulden v. Janecka

Allen v. Figuera

United States v. Crosby

Gutierrez v. Torres

United States v. Harris

Spahr v. Ferber Resorts, LLC

Roth v. Wilder

Governor Hickenlooper Signs Many More Bills into Law

Early this week, nineteen bills reached Governor John Hickenlooper’s desk. They comprised of the fifth group and sixth group of bills to emerge from the 2011 General Assembly.

  • HB 11-1030
    • Sponsored by Rep. B. Gardner and Sen. Boyd. Set Aside for Program Requiring the State to First Solicit Bids from Nonprofits Employing People with Severe Disabilities.
  • HB 11-1117
    • Sponsored by Reps. McCann and Court and Sen. S. King. Subpoenas Issued by Administrative Law Judges in Campaign Finance Proceedings.
  • HB 11-1148
    • Sponsored by Reps. Labuda and Nikkel and Sen. Boyd. Disclosure of Employment Information to an Employer Regarding a Health Care Worker and Immunity on Disclosing said Information.
  • HB 11-1202
    • Sponsored by Rep. Labuda and Sen. Tochtrop. Requiring Public Entities to have Appropriations Available Prior to Work by a Contractor Pursuant to a Change Order.
  • SB 11-002
    • Sponsored by Sen. Carroll and Rep. J. Kerr. Low-income Telephone Assistance Program Guidelines.
  • SB 11-020
    • Sponsored by Sen. Morse and Rep. Stephens. Authorization of Certain Employees of the Department of Law as Peace Officers.
  • SB 11-093
    • Sponsored by Sen. S. King and Rep. Vaad. Continuation of Interagency Task Force on Drunk Driving.
  • SB 11-101
    • Sponsored by Sen. Spence and Rep. Swalm. Continuation of Fixed Rate and Tuition Fee Program.
  • SB 11-103
    • Sponsored by Sens. Lundberg and Foster and Rep. Scott. Repeal of the Benefit Design Advisory Committee.
  • SB 11-104
    • Sponsored by Sen. Roberts and Rep. Holbert. Repeal of Community Accountability Program Advisory Board.
  • SB 11-106
    • Sponsored by Sen. Spence and Rep. Ferrandino. Repeal of the Science and Technology Education Grants Advisory Board.
  • SB 11-123
    • Sponsored by Sen. Foster and Rep. Summers. Technical Changes to Child Support Procedures.
  • SB 11-061
    • Sponsored by Sen. Spence and Rep. Ferrandino. Process for Appeals Under the “Exceptional Children’s Education Act.”
  • HB 11-1177
    • Sponsored by Reps. Sonnenberg and Jones and Sens. Schwartz and White. Extension of Voluntary Tax Contributions to the Healthy Rivers Fund.
  • HB 11-1031
    • Sponsored by Rep. Miklosi and Sen. Foster. Authorizing Specific Local Governments to Designate a Portion of their Territory as a Creative District.
  • HB 11-1040
    • Sponsored by Rep. Brown and Sen. Tochtrop. Increase in Term Length for State Conservation Board Members.
  • HB 11-1085
    • Sponsored by Rep. S. Schafer and Sen. Jahn. Guidelines for Referral of Offenders to Community Corrections.
  • SB 11-029
    • Sponsored by Sen. Hudak and Rep. Summers. Annual Reports of the State Board of Land Commissioners Regulations.
  • SB 11-086
    • Sponsored by Sen. Foster and Rep. Murray. Period Governing the Appeals of Taxpayers in Tax Disputes with Local Government.

For a complete list of Governor Hickenlooper’s 2011 legislation decisions click here.

Protected

2013-05-25 11:17:23