“We are the Borg. You will be assimilated.
Lower your shields and surrender your ships.
We will add your biological and technological distinctiveness to our own.
Your culture will adapt to serve us.
Resistance is futile.”
In his book Between Two Ages: The 21st Century and the Crisis of Meaning, futurist and Washington think-tanker Van Wishard says this:
America is at the vortex of a global cyclone of change so vast and deep that it is uprooting established institutions, altering centuries-old relationships, changing underlying mores and attitudes. . . . It is not simply change at the margins; it is change at the very core of life. Culture-smashing change.
The law is among the “established institutions” currently being “uprooted” by “culture-smashing change.” Consider, for example, the legal service ventures we looked at in Winds of Change (Part 4): Future Shock and the Business of Law and Wind of Change (Part 5): the New Lawyer Entrepreneurs. The magnitude of change these ventures indicate was unthinkable ten, even five years ago. Many of them are driven by young lawyers. No surprise there. More surprising is the legal profession’s apparent inability to recognize and explain the exodus of talent out of established practice models into new ones.
For example, a recent ABA compilation of Martindale-Hubbell data concluded that the legal profession is getting older, citing a rise in median age from 39 to 49 over the 25-year period ending in 2005. Indiana University law professor William Henderson offered several possible explanations for these findings at Legal Whiteboard, and concluded:
Arguably, the simplest explanation for these patterns is that it has gotten much harder over time to parlay a JD degree into paid employment as a licensed lawyer. So, faced with a saturated legal market, law school graduates have been pursuing careers outside of law.
So far so good, but we might further speculate that some of those “careers outside of law” are actually moves into the new legal service ventures, in which lawyers (and non-lawyers — which is a whole other issue) are providing services that have historically been considered practicing law. If so, then at least some licensed lawyers are still parlaying their law degrees into paid employment, but doing so in settings outside of the Martindale-Hubbell database, which for that 25 year period was focused on traditional law firm practice.
This is more than a data collection issue. Neurological research suggests that our observation and cognitive faculties are linked to culture, which explains why the old (traditional law practice culture) has trouble seeing the new (the new legal service ventures). Columbia University’s Norman Doidge, M.D. summarizes this research in his book The Brain That Changes Itself:
The idea that culture may change such fundamental brain activities as sight and perception is a radical one.
Culture can influence the development of perceptual learning because perception is not (as many assume) a passive, “bottom up” process that begins when energy in the outside world strikes the sense receptors, then passes signals to the “higher” perceptual centers in the brain.
The neuroscientists Manfred Fahle and Tomaso Poggio have shown experimentally that “higher” levels of perception affect how neuroplastic change in the “lower,” sensory parts of the brain develops.
In other words, our cultural point of view determines what we see and don’t see, and can literally blind us to new developments happening in our midst.
Thus it’s possible that the future of law has arrived right under the Borg’s unseeing gaze. The new legal services entrepreneurs certainly think so: their pitches offer both lawyers and consumers relief from the things about traditional law practice that drive them crazy. (Check out this one and this one.)
“Culture-smashing change” indeed.