February 20, 2017

SB 17-011: Creating a Study to Improve Transportation Access for People with Disabilities

On January 11, 2017, Sen. Kent Lambert and Rep. Polly Lawrence introduced SB 17-011, “Concerning the Creation of a Technical Demonstration Forum to Study Solutions to Improve Transportation Access for People with Disabilities.”

The bill creates a technical demonstration forum consisting of seven members to study and document how advanced technologies can improve transportation access for people with disabilities. The forum consists of the following agency officers or their designees:

  • The executive director of the department of labor and employment, who serves as chair of the forum;
  • The executive director of the department of health care policy and financing, who serves as vice-chair of the forum;
  • The director of the public utilities commission;
  • The chief information officer of the office of information technology;
  • The executive director of the department of human services;
  • The director of the division of veterans affairs; and
  • The superintendent of the Colorado school for the deaf and the blind.

To demonstrate the transportation access needs of people with disabilities in both urban and rural areas of the state, the forum is directed to study the transportation access needs of people with disabilities in El Paso and Teller counties and explore technological and transportation business solutions that could increase transportation access for people with disabilities in those areas. The forum may recommend that the executive director of the department of labor and employment enter into a contract with a technology developer or transportation business to conduct one or more pilot projects in El Paso County, Teller County, or both counties to demonstrate the efficacy of a certain technology or transportation business product to improve transportation access for people with disabilities.

On or before December 31, 2017, the forum is required to publish a report of its research and findings, including the results of any pilot projects and any legislative recommendations developed, and to furnish copies of the report to the governor, members of the general assembly’s majority and minority leadership, and the members of the joint budget committee.

The forum and its responsibilities are repealed, effective July 1, 2018.

The bill was introduced in the Senate and assigned to the Health & Human Services committee. It was scheduled for hearing in committee on January 26, 2017.

HB 17-1026: Concerning Reverse Mortgage Repayment when Home Uninhabitable

On January 11, 2017, Rep. Jonathan Singer and Sen. Matt Jones introduced HB 17-1026, “Concerning the Suspension of a Borrower’s Obligation to Repay a Reverse Mortgage when a Force Majeure Renders the Subject Property Uninhabitable as a Principal Residence.”

Under current law, the borrower in a reverse mortgage transaction is relieved of the obligation to occupy the subject property as a principal residence if the borrower is temporarily absent for up to 60 days or, if the property is adequately secured, up to one year. The bill adds a third exception to the principal-residence requirement to cover situations in which a natural disaster or other serious incident beyond the borrower’s control renders the property uninhabitable. The maximum time allowable for a temporary absence under these circumstances is 5 years.

The bill was introduced in the House and assigned to the Local Government committee. It is scheduled to be heard in committee on January 25, 2017, at 1:30 p.m.

SB 17-004: Allowing Nonenrolled Medicaid Providers to Charge for Services

On January 11, 2017, Sen. Jake Tate and Rep. Cole Wist introduced SB 17-004, “Concerning Access by Medicaid Recipients to Nonenrolled Medical Providers.”

Under current law, recipients of services under the Colorado medical assistance program (medicaid) are not responsible for the cost of services by a medical provider or the cost remaining after payment by medicaid or another private insurer, regardless of whether the medical provider is enrolled in the medicaid program, unless the medical services provided are nonreimbursable by medicaid. The bill amends the statute so that the prohibition on charging medicaid recipients for medical services applies only if the medical provider is enrolled in medicaid.

Prior to providing medical services to a medicaid recipient, a nonenrolled provider must enter into a written agreement with the recipient as specified in the bill. If the requirements are met, the medicaid recipient would be responsible for the cost of the medical services.

The bill was introduced in the Senate and assigned to the Health & Human Services Committee. It is scheduled to be heard in committee on January 26, 2017, at 1:30 p.m.

SB 17-003: Repealing the Colorado Health Benefit Exchange Act

On January 11, 2017, Sen. Jim Smallwood and Rep. Patrick Neville introduced SB 17-003, “Concerning the Repeal of the ‘Colorado Health Benefit Exchange Act.'”

In 2010, pursuant to the enactment of federal law that allowed each state to establish a health benefit exchange option through state law or opt to participate in a national exchange, the general assembly enacted the ‘Colorado Health Benefit Exchange Act’ (act). The act created the state exchange, a board of directors (board) to implement the exchange, and a legislative health benefits exchange implementation review committee to make recommendations to the board. The bill repeals the act, effective January 1, 2018, and allows the exchange to continue for one year for the purpose of winding up its affairs. The bill also requires the board, on the last day of the wind-up period, to transfer any unencumbered money that remains in the exchange to the state treasurer, who shall transfer the money to the general fund.

The bill was introduced in the Senate and assigned to the Finance Committee.

Top Five Programs and Homestudies of 2016: Elder Law

The year is drawing to a close, which means that the compliance period is ending for a third of Colorado’s attorneys. Still missing some credits? Don’t worry, CBA-CLE has got you covered.

Today on Legal Connection we are featuring the Top Five Elder Law Programs and Homestudies. CBA-CLE offers many great programs of importance to elder law practitioners, and also has some great books. Find out more here – cle.cobar.org/Practice-Area/Elder.

5. Elder Law Basics – Shifting Our Perspectives to Our Elders
Aging isn’t just a biological process — it’s also a legal, financial and cultural one. Different cultures have different attitudes and practices around aging and death, and these cultural perspectives can have a huge effect on our experience of getting older. While many cultures celebrate the aging process and venerate their elders, in western cultures, where youth is idolized and preserved at all costs, the elderly are commonly removed from the community and relegated to hospitals and nursing homes.  Physical signs of human aging tend to be regarded with distaste, and aging is often depicted in a negative light in popular culture, if it is depicted at all. Has the western fear of aging kept our elders from living full lives? Is it time to change our perspective? We as a profession and society may have to shift our perspective and our attention as the American population ages. The Elder Law Basics Seminar is not only for you if you are new to elder law, it is  for you if you practice law at all, because there is not a practice area that elder law does not touch. Order the Video OnDemand here, the CD homestudy here, and the MP3 here. Available for 7 general credits, including 1 ethics credit.

4. When the Diagnosis is Alzheimer’s: Issues and Solutions for Counselors and Caregivers
This innovative program will speak to attorneys who are dealing with aging and disabled clients as well as attorneys who are caregivers for persons with dementia in their own families. Providing an in-depth look at the issues and solutions presented by Alzheimer’s disease, the program will start with an overview of dementia from Karen Moravek, Community Education Coordinator with the Colorado Chapter of the Alzheimer’s Association. The program will then shift into the legal issues facing your clients and families. The program concludes with a panel discussion and opportunity for questions about Alzheimer’s Resources, Social Security Disability, Geriatric Care Management and Long-Term Care Insurance. This dynamic and informative program promises to answer your questions about Alzheimer’s disease, whether you are a counselor or a caregiver! Order the Video OnDemand here, the CD homestudy here, and the MP3 here. Available for 3 general credits, including 1 ethics credit.

3. Elder Law Basics: Counseling Our Seniors
Thanks to the baby boomer generation, the number of senior citizens is growing rapidly. As the boomer population reaches age 65, the senior population is projected to reach 83.7 million – almost double the estimated number in 2012, and approximately twenty percent of the total US population. Roughly 10,000 people will turn 65 every day for the next 20 years! This increasing elderly population has and will necessitate more senior legal representation. With a rapidly growing senior population, there is no better time to be a part of this practice area. And CBA-CLE is your essential source for advancing your knowledge, cultivating relationships and sharpening the skills necessary to work with and on behalf of our elders. Order the Video OnDemand here, the CD homestudy here, and the MP3 here. Available for 7 general credits, including 1 ethics credit.

2. Guardianships and Conservatorships: Addressing the Tough Issues
The role of guardian and conservator often involves leading and having difficult conversations. At this CLE Seminar, you will learn from some of the most experienced and knowledgeable practitioners in this field about how best to counsel your clients and their families when these conversations have to take place. Whether the ward must be involuntarily placed after a mental health proceeding, when a criminal matter may arise, or even when the controversial issue of involuntary sterilization or abortion becomes an issue, your trusted faculty will guide you through every step of the way. Order the Video OnDemand here, the CD homestudy here, and the MP3 here. Available for 7 general credits, including 1 ethics credit.

1. 8th Annual Elder Law Retreat
This annual event combines a weekend in the mountains with learning about elder law from some of the state’s top practitioners. Topics covered at the 8th Annual Elder Law Retreat in Vail included Creating a Tax-wise Portfolio for a 3rd Party Special Needs Trust, Post-Adjudication Right to Counsel in Protective Proceedings, Medicaid: Planning With and Valuation of Unique Assets, Undoing What Was Wrongfully Done for Real Estate and Financial Transactions, Mental Health Issues in Guardianships and Conservatorships, and more. Order the CD homestudy here and the MP3 here. Available for 18 general credits, including 3 ethics credits.

Colorado Gives: Disability Law Colorado Recognizes the Inherent Value of All People and Embraces Empowerment

Colorado Gives: CBA CLE Legal Connection will be focusing on several Colorado legal charities in the next few days to prepare for Colorado Gives Day, December 6, 2016. These charities, and many, many others, greatly appreciate your donations of time and money.

dlc-630x160Disability Law Colorado (formerly known as The Legal Center for People with Disabilities and Older People) was created in 1976 out of the dream of a small group of parents who came together to secure equal rights for their children with developmental disabilities who were living in state institutions. These parents wanted a better life for their children and believed that all people with disabilities deserved the right to live full and rewarding lives. Disability Law Colorado’s early successes included requiring school districts to pay for children’s education in public schools, allowing children with severe disabilities to attend school for the first time. Disability Law Colorado also succeeded in preventing sterilization of people with developmental disabilities and preventing workplace discrimination against people with disabilities.

In 1977, the governor designated Disability Law Colorado to be Colorado’s Protection and Advocacy (P&A) System for people with developmental disabilities. Today, Disability Law Colorado is recognized as a leader in the National Disability Rights Network made up of Protection and Advocacy programs from all the states and territories.

For Colorado Gives Day, Disability Law Colorado has a $15,000 fundraising goal. By donating through Colorado Gives, your gift will go further thanks to a $1 million dollar incentive fund. Click here to donate.

18th Judicial District’s Senior Law Day and Safety Summit is October 14, 2016

2016 cover sample_Layout 1The 18th Judicial District Attorney’s Office will host its annual Senior Law Day and Safety Summit on Friday, October 14, 2016, at the Charles Schwab & Co. Events Center in Lone Tree (9899 Schwab Way #100, Lone Tree, CO 80124). This year’s event will focus on topics pertaining to legal, safety, and fraud awareness issues in later life. Seniors, family members, professionals in the field of aging; and individuals contemplating retirement are particularly encouraged to attend.

Registration for the event is $10, and includes a copy of the 2016 Senior Law Handbook, a boxed lunch, snacks, and an opportunity to sign up for a free consultation with an attorney on a first-come, first-served basis. Registration information is available here.

For more information, contact Barbara Martin-Worley at (720) 874-8487 or bmw@da18.state.co.us.

Colorado Court of Appeals: Probate Court Lacked Authority to Order “Chemical Castration”

The Colorado Court of Appeals issued its opinion in People in Interest of C.J.R. on Thursday, September 8, 2016.

Probate Court Authority—Chemical Castration—Medina Factors.

C.J.R. is a long-term patient at a state hospital, where he is treated for a form of psychosis. He has also engaged in “sexually inappropriate behavior” for some time. C.J.R. was treated for years with antipsychotic drugs. After a change in his drug therapy, his sexually inappropriate behavior worsened. As a result, a psychiatrist prescribed Depo-Provera by injection every 90 days. The use of Depo-Provera for this purpose is commonly called chemical castration. C.J.R. refused to take the drug voluntarily, and the People sought authorization from the Denver Probate Court to administer it involuntarily. The probate court authorized the involuntary administration of Depo-Provera and use of a nasogastric tube to administer other drugs. C.J.R. appealed.

In People v. Medina, the Colorado Supreme Court formulated a four-factor test that the People must satisfy before a court may order a patient to be forcibly medicated. Medina dealt with antipsychotic drugs. The court of appeals held that it does not apply to a request to involuntarily administer the synthetic equivalent of progesterone as part of the treatment for a mentally ill male patient at a state hospital for the express purpose of controlling his sexually inappropriate behavior.

In addition, the court found that even if the Medina test were applicable here, the People did not prove by clear and convincing evidence that the requirements of Medina were established because (1) there was not record support that there were no less intrusive alternative treatments available, and (2) C.J.R.’s need for treatment with medication was not sufficiently compelling to override “any bona fide and legitimate interest of the patient in refusing treatment.”

The part of the probate court’s order authorizing involuntary administration of Depo-Provera was reversed. That part of the order authorizing the use of a nasogastric tube to administer other medications was affirmed.

Summary provided courtesy of The Colorado Lawyer.

Colorado Court of Appeals: Defendant’s Confrontation Clause Rights Not Violated by Video Conference Deposition

The Colorado Court of Appeals issued its opinion in People v. Hebert on Thursday, September 8, 2016.

Michelle Ann Hebert convinced an elderly gentleman to give her loans totaling several hundred thousand dollars and did not repay him. The elderly gentleman called the police, and Hebert was charged with theft from an at-risk adult. A public defender was appointed for Hebert, and the prosecution moved that same day to depose the victim. The prosecution requested that the victim be deposed from his own home via video conference due to his failing health. The defense argued that allowing a video conference deposition would violate Hebert’s Confrontation Clause rights, and that his assistance would be ineffective because he did not have time to prepare. The district court granted the prosecution’s motion after a hearing, but ordered that the deposition be held in five weeks in order to give the defense time to prepare. Six weeks later, the victim was deposed via video conference and the deposition was recorded. The victim died before trial, so the recorded deposition was admitted at trial.

After the deposition but before trial, Hebert retained private counsel. Shortly thereafter, the People charged Hebert with additional tax-related offenses, and her private counsel moved to withdraw. Hebert requested appointed counsel, but the public defender’s office determined she was ineligible. She represented herself at trial and was convicted on all counts. She appealed, arguing that the district court erred in failing to make its own findings after the district court found her ineligible for appointed counsel, and by admitting the recorded deposition at trial.

The Colorado Court of Appeals first addressed Hebert’s contention about appointed counsel. In her application, Hebert contended she had meager assets, was responsible for three children, and was separating from her husband. On her joint tax return, she claimed approximately $76,000 in income for that year. The district court considered the tax return and Hebert and her husband’s testimony. Her husband testified that they had never separated, and Hebert admitted she had only claimed they were separating so she could qualify for a public defender. The district court considered the evidence and determined Hebert was not qualified for a public defender. The court of appeals determined the district court’s findings were supported by evidence and therefore there was no abuse of discretion.

The court of appeals next evaluated Hebert’s claims that she was denied a fair trial when the district court admitted the video testimony before her counsel had adequate time to prepare for the deposition. The court of appeals perceived no error. The district court specifically postponed the deposition so that counsel would be able to prepare prior to the deposition.

Hebert also argued her Confrontation Clause rights were violated because she did not have the opportunity to confront her accuser face-to-face. The court of appeals noted that the right to confront an accuser face-to-face is not absolute, and when public policy concerns warrant and the reliability of testimony is otherwise assured, testimony may be obtained other than face-to-face. The court found that the victim in this case was medically unavailable due to his fragile health, crediting two letters and an affidavit from the victim’s doctor that stated that being in the same room with Hebert would cause the victim’s blood pressure to rise to a potentially fatal level. The court of appeals agreed with the district court that the victim’s fragile health necessitated a video conference deposition from the victim’s home. The court found the video reliable, because he gave testimony under oath, was contemporaneously cross-examined by Hebert’s counsel, and the jury was able to assess his demeanor in the video. The court also found no Crawford violation from the video testimony, because the victim was deceased at the time of trial and Hebert was fully able to cross-examine him during the deposition.

The court of appeals affirmed the conviction and sentence.

Social Media Abuse of Elders

Editor’s Note: This post originally appeared on Barbara Cashman’s Denver Elder Law Blog on August 10, 2016. Reprinted with permission.

CashmanBy Barbara Cashman, Esq.

I recently came across this horrifying article published Monday in ProPublica, entitled “Federal Health Officials Seek to Stop Social Media Abuse of Nursing Home Residents.” It seems that some staff members of nursing homes are publishing photos, audio and video recordings of some residents in the social media like Snapchat, Facebook or Instagram, or sent in text messages as multimedia attachments. These pictures, audio, and video files often depict elder residents of the facilities in demeaning and humiliating ways so as to result in mental abuse. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services has recently sent out a memorandum concerning this to the State Survey Directors.

Do the skilled nursing facilities have prohibitions against such intrusions in place? Some evidently did not, but there can be little doubt that nearly all will have such protections in place soon in light of these disturbing developments. Here’s an article about such violations in Ohio nursing facilities.

The CMS memo referred to above defines mental abuse as that abuse which:

[M]ay occur through either verbal or nonverbal conduct which causes or has the potential to cause the resident to experience humiliation, intimidation, fear, shame, agitation or degradation.  Examples of verbal or nonverbal conduct that can cause mental abuse include but are not limited to: nursing home staff taking photographs or recordings or residents that are demeaning or humiliating using any type of equipment (e.g., cameras, smart phone, and other electronic devices) and keeping or distributing them through multimedia messages or on social media networks.  Depending on what was photographed or recorded, physical and/or sexual abuse may also be identified.

ProPublica has been following this following these developments for many months; this article from December 21, 2015 details some of the incidents this mental and physical abuse of incapacitated elders perpetrate by the nursing home staff members. In a case in New York where a nurse aide took photos of an incontinent resident’s genitals covered in fecal matter and shared them with another staff member on Snapchat, he was fired and pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor count of willful violation of health laws. What I found particularly disturbing was the comment of one home’s administrator to ProPublica that “[t]echnology is a problem for us, for everybody, these days… The resident involved was not harmed but certainly it was a serious incident.” Are incapacitated nursing home residents not entitled to any human dignity and to be free from such exploitation for someone’s entertainment?

One of the incidents described by ProPublica is from August 2015. It occurred in a rural area of Colorado and involved a youth volunteer at a nursing home who took a selfie which showed a 108-year-old resident urinating. The volunteer apparently shared the photo with her friends at school and the facility did not learn of the offending photo until months later. The volunteer was not monitored by the facility but did report to the local police, and was later charged with invasion of privacy.

What is human dignity when it cannot be defended by an incapacitated elder? What is human dignity when it is not readily apparent or recognized in places where people are institutionalized for the paramount concern of their safety?

Dignity, as in the legal right, is not easily defined. In fact, you would be hard pressed to find many references to it in our laws. International law, specifically the international law of human rights, has much more to say about human dignity, but that is another blog post!

I will close with just a couple observations and questions.

If humiliation is the opposite of being treated dignity and respect, is our system of laws really equipped to deal with this type of new frontier of the rights of incapacitated persons to be free from intrusions by others who humiliate them for sport or humor?

Is the dignity of or respect for elders a right in this context or is it overshadowed by our concerns for safety, and how does an incapacitated elder’s diminishing bailiwick of autonomy factor into this equation?

On this note, here is a link to an interesting article about the dignity of elders. More to come on this very challenging topic.

© 2016 Barbara Cashman  www.DenverElderLaw.org

 

Barbara Cashman is a solo practitioner in Denver, focusing on elder law, estate law, and mediation. She is active in the Trust & Estate and Elder Law sections of the CBA and is a past chair of the Solo/Small Firm section. She is a CAMP mentor and blogs weekly on her law firm blog, where this post originally appeared. She can be contacted at barb@DenverElderLaw.org.

The opinions and views expressed by Featured Bloggers on CBA-CLE Legal Connection do not necessarily represent the opinions and views of the Colorado Bar Association, the Denver Bar Association, or CBA-CLE, and should not be construed as such.

Denver Senior Law Day is This Friday, July 29, 2016

2016 cover sample_Layout 1The Denver Senior Law Day will be held this Friday, July 29, 2016, at the PPA Event Center in Denver. The event will run from 8 am to noon. Join some of Denver’s top elder law attorneys to learn about legal issues affecting older adults. Topics to be presented include fraud prevention, Medicare issues, estate planning basics, probate procedures, and more. The Ask-A-Lawyer table will return for this year’s event, and each attendee will receive a copy of the 2016 Senior Law Handbook.

Registration is now open online — click here to register. Questions? Call (303) 757-4342 or email SLD@denverprobatelaw.com.

For more information, visit www.denverseniorlawday.com.

Let’s Raise Awareness About Elder Abuse!

Editor’s Note: This post originally appeared on Barbara Cashman’s Denver Elder Law blog on June 29, 2016. Reprinted with permission.

CashmanI wanted to circle back on the importance of raising awareness of elder abuse. You can read the Presidential Proclamation on June 15, 2016, for World Elder Abuse Awareness Day right here and if you’re curious about the language of the Elder Justice Act, passed as part of the Affordable Care Act (as Title VI subtitle H, §§ 6701, et seq.), read this link.

In Colorado, as in nearly all other states, adult protection units are responsible for the reporting and investigation of elder abuse (along with law enforcement agencies). The Elder Justice Act is federal legislation that requires the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services “to oversee the development and management of federal resources for protecting out seniors from elder abuse.” Additionally, the U.S. Department of Justice is charged with taking action to prevent elder abuse.

The effective coordination of these county, state, and federal efforts is of course a work in progress. What we do know about raising awareness of elder abuse and exploitation is that it will lead to more reporting of such abuse. Here is a link to a recent article in the Sacramento Bee which links the raised awareness of such abuse to a dramatic increase in reports to local law enforcement. This is important to bear in mind as the baby boomers begin to become a greater proportion of the cohort affected by elder abuse and exploitation. In my practice, I have unfortunately become familiar with national and international internet scams which relieve elders of their hard-earned retirement money. This is a particular area in which the federal government might play a unique role as so much of our law of the internet is based in federal law.

Another tragic side effect of the victimization of elders, besides the shame, victimization and impoverishment which results from financial exploitation is that these elders, along with elder victims of all types of elder abuse — including physical and sexual abuse — are likely to die much sooner than their peers who were not victimized. But many pieces of this puzzle remain unidentified due to the lack of long term studies which collect valuable statistics about elder abuse of various types! This is of course another aspect of the importance of raising awareness. Because so much of elder abuse still remains unreported, this is a major quality of life challenge not just for elders and their loved ones and community, but also for those of us of “a certain age” who might be looking forward to a safe and meaningful elderhood. How can we make things better for elders at risk now and in the future?

What is elder abuse and who are its primary victims of such elder abuse? By the numbers, they are largely women and the “old” of the elder population — meaning folks over 80. Sadly, the vast majority of the abusers are family members of the elder or trusted friends or advisors. Because most elders live in the community — not in institutions — this is a particular challenge for all of us who are community members to become familiar with the signs so that we can report concerns about safety, suspicious behaviors and the like to local law enforcement.

First — what are the kinds of elder abuse that we’re talking about? Here is a helpful listing from the U.S. government’s Administration on Aging website, which also has many helpful resources:

  • Physical Abuse—inflicting physical pain or injury on a senior, e.g., slapping, bruising, or restraining by physical or chemical means.
  • Sexual Abuse—non-consensual sexual contact of any kind.
  • Neglect—the failure by those responsible to provide food, shelter, health care, or protection for a vulnerable elder.
  • Exploitation—the illegal taking, misuse, or concealment of funds, property, or assets of a senior for someone else’s benefit.
  • Emotional Abuse—inflicting mental pain, anguish, or distress on an elder person through verbal or nonverbal acts, e.g., humiliating, intimidating, or threatening.
  • Abandonment—desertion of a vulnerable elder by anyone who has assumed the responsibility for care or custody of that person.
  • Self-neglect—characterized as the failure of a person to perform essential, self-care tasks and that such failure threatens his or her own health or safety.

And what about the warning signs of elder abuse of which we can be more aware?

  • Bruises, pressure marks, broken bones, abrasions, and burns may be an indication of physical abuse, neglect, or mistreatment.
  • Unexplained withdrawal from normal activities, a sudden change in alertness, and unusual depression may be indicators of emotional abuse.
  • Bruises around the breasts or genital area can occur from sexual abuse.
  • Sudden changes in financial situations may be the result of exploitation.
  • Bedsores, unattended medical needs, poor hygiene, and unusual weight loss are indicators of possible neglect.
  • Behavior such as belittling, threats, and other uses of power and control by spouses are indicators of verbal or emotional abuse.
  • Strained or tense relationships, frequent arguments between the caregiver and elderly person are also signs.
  • Changes in the elder’s personality or behavior, especially if the elder becomes withdrawn or despondent, questions to her or him can be very important in identifying a situation which may be the cause of the elder’s silent suffering.

Lastly, here is another helpful self-help resource specifically for Colorado residents – from Colorado Legal Services.  That’s all for now – but don’t forget . . . . Denver’s Senior law Day is coming up on Friday July 29, 2016 and will be held at the Denver Police Protective Association’s Event Center.  More details later.

© Barbara E. Cashman 2016   www.DenverElderLaw.org

Barbara Cashman is a solo practitioner in Denver, focusing on elder law, estate law, and mediation. She is active in the Trust & Estate and Elder Law sections of the CBA and is a past chair of the Solo/Small Firm section. She is a CAMP mentor and blogs weekly on her law firm blog, where this post originally appeared. She can be contacted at barb@DenverElderLaw.org.

The opinions and views expressed by Featured Bloggers on CBA-CLE Legal Connection do not necessarily represent the opinions and views of the Colorado Bar Association, the Denver Bar Association, or CBA-CLE, and should not be construed as such.