February 22, 2012

Project Visibility: Understanding the Strengths and Needs of the Elder GLBT Community

There is increasing evidence that gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender elders in our community are uncertain where to turn and what to do if they need care or support services. They are concerned with the level of sensitivity and awareness on the part of staff at facilities, businesses, and agencies. The GLBT Center and the Denver Regional Council of Governments (DRCOG) recognize that with a growing population of GLBT elders in the Denver area, steps need to be taken now to ensure a safe and healthy future for these older adults.

Project Visibility is a sensitivity program that began through Boulder County Aging Services, and has developed into a dynamic and continually updated training format that has touched hundreds of concerned providers in Colorado and across the country. The training is comprised of a moving film that showcases the lives of lesbian and gay elders, a Power Point presentation, and discussion of the steps service providers can take to provide good service for the GLBT community.

Free training for people serving older adults will be provided Wednesday, February 15, 2012 at Denver Regional Council of Governments Area Agency on Aging 1290 Broadway, Denver CO 80203, from 9:00 am to 12:00 pm.

Participants will receive

  • A new awareness of the strengths and needs of elder GLBTs
  • A manual to help you get started on simple and effective steps to communicate that your services/agency is welcoming and safe, and
  • Inclusion in a directory of service providers for GLBT elders developed by DRCOG and The Center.

To take part in this free training, contact Jennifer Solms at (303) 480-6796 or jsolms@drcog.org, or Shari Wilkins at (303) 733-7743, ext. 122 or swilkins@glbtcolorado.org.

SB 12-024: Residential Non-Profit Corporations — Open Meeting Provision Clarification and Limitation of Conditions Under Which Member Refunds Due

On January 11, 2012, Sen. Ted Harvey introduced SB 12-024 – Concerning the Obligations of a Residential Non-Profit Corporation to its Residential Members, and, In Connection Therewith, Clarifying Open Meeting Provisions and Limiting the Conditions Under Which the Corporation Must Refund Moneys Paid By a Residential Member. This summary is published here courtesy of the Colorado Bar Association’s e-Legislative Report.

The bill relieves a residential nonprofit corporation of its current obligations to:

  • Refund the entrance fee of a residential member within 90 days after the member’s resignation, termination, expulsion, or suspension from the corporation; and
  • Hold a member or his or her heirs harmless from liability for any periodic payments due more than 30 days after the member’s termination due to death or another reason beyond the member’s control.

This bill specifies that meetings of a committee of the board of directors that is not authorized to take final action on the board’s behalf are not subject to open meeting and published agenda requirements. The bill passed unamended from the Senate Local Government Committee; bill awaits 2nd Reading.

Since this summary, the bill has passed a second and third reading in the Senate unamended.

Summaries of other featured bills can be found here.

SB 12-032: Seeking Federal Waiver of Medicaid Eligibility Guidelines in Order to Allow Greater Flexibility and Efficiency

On January 11, 2012, Sen. Greg Brophy introduced SB 12-032 – Concerning Reforms to State-Administered Health Care Assistance Programs By Seeking Federal Authorization to Allow the State Greater Flexibility in the Management of the Programs. This summary is published here courtesy of the Colorado Bar Association’s e-Legislative Report.

The bill requires the department of health care policy and financing to seek a federal waiver to allow for increased flexibility and efficiency in the management of the Medicaid program and the children’s basic health plan.

The waiver will seek authorization to determine eligibility categories and income levels and to establish an asset test for eligibility, implement cost-sharing and premiums, encourage the use of private health benefits coverage, and encourage persons to maintain employer-sponsored health insurance. As part of the waiver, the state department may negotiate for capped federal reimbursements with provisions for adjustments in the federal reimbursements for population growth and inflation.

The state department shall report to the general assembly concerning the waiver request and identify necessary changes to state law to implement the reforms requested in the waiver. Assigned to the Health and Human Services Committee.

On February 1, this bill was postponed indefinitely by the Senate Committee on Health and Human Services.

Summaries of other featured bills can be found here.

State Board of Health Proposes Rule to Require Annual Influenza Vaccination for Certain Nursing Facility Personnel

The Colorado State Board of Health has proposed a rule to require all acute care and long-term nursing care facilities to annually vaccinate personnel against influenza. All other licensed healthcare entities must assess their own clients, staff, and services and develop a written policy regarding influenza vaccination of its health care workers. All licensed healthcare entities will be required to annually report their influenza vaccination rates to the Department.

A hearing on the proposed rule will be held on Wednesday, February 15, 2012 at the Department of Public Health and Environment, Building A, Sabin-Cleere Conference Room, 4300 Cherry Creek Drive South, Denver, Colorado 80246, beginning at 10:00 am.

Full text of the proposed rule can be found here. Further information about the rule and hearing can be found here.

e-Legislative Report: Week Three, January 30, 2012

The latest Legislative Video Update recaps Military Day at the Capitol and Phase 2 of the SMART Act. Additionally, it reviews which bills the Legislative Policy Committee moved to support during their January 27 meeting.

Military Day at the Capitol

The Senate and House honored Colorado veterans on Monday with what is affectionately called “Military Day at the Capitol.” Both Houses take time to celebrate service men and women, active and retired, through several joint resolutions. The presentations are a welcome relief from the day to day operations at the Capitol and an appropriate way to say “Thank You” to our veterans. Here is a list of the resolutions:

  • Concerning recognition of Military, Veterans, and MIA/POW Appreciation Day.
  • Concerning recognition of military personnel from Colorado who died during specific military conflicts, including those killed after September 11, 2001, during the War on Terrorism, including but not limited to those killed in Afghanistan and Iraq.
  • Concerning the U.S.S. Pueblo.
  • Concerning the designation of Interstate 70 across Colorado as part of a nationwide system of “Tuskegee Airmen Memorial Trails”.

The presentations are a welcome relief from the day to day operations at the Capitol and an appropriate way to say “Thank You” to our veterans.

SMART Act

Again, the floor was light and the committees of reference were busily working through Phase 2 of the SMART Act review process. In case you missed last week, HB 10-119, or the State Measurements for Accountable, Responsive, and Transparent (SMART) Government Act, was adopted in 2010 and part of the act requires departments of state government to suggest improved efficiency or administration through line item consolidation in the budget bill. The presentations to the committees of reference include information about:

  • The departments’ strategic plan;
  • A review of the departments’ performance-based goals and measures; and
  • A report on actual outcomes.

Phase 2 of the meetings with the committees of reference call for the committees to recommend or vote their support for the various budget priority requests from the departments they oversee; e.g. Judiciary Committees oversee the Judicial Branch (Judicial Branch, Public Defender, Alternate Defense Counsel, Office of Child Representative), Department of Corrections, and the Department of Public Safety. The committees met to discuss recommendations and votes but this process is new and the kinks are being worked out. We are hoping for a comprehensive statement from each committee detailing their votes and recommendations to the Joint Budget Committee (JBC).

As the legislature moves to the fourth week of the session, the committee calendars are starting to look like they are in midsession form in terms of workload.

CBA Legislative Policy Committee

For followers who are new to CBA legislative activity, the Legislative Policy Committee (LPC) is the CBA’s legislative policy-making arm during the legislative session. The LPC meets weekly during the legislative session to determine CBA positions from requests from the various sections and committees of the Bar Association.

At the January 27 meeting of the LPC, the Committee voted to adopt as Bar Sponsored legislation a proposal from the Trust and Estate Section. The proposal is designed to put “guard rails” around the search a personal representative, trustee or their legal counsel is required to undertake when searching for a filed Designated Beneficiary Agreement (DBA). To be effective, DBAs are filed with a clerk and recorder where one of the parties is domiciled. When the law was passed in 2009 the law was silent on the duty to search for a filed DBA; as a consequence, the fiduciary or their attorney could conceivably be required to search all 64 counties in Colorado. The Trust and Estate section is seeking to limit the number of counties being searched and to limit the time frame to make the search. This situation arises when there isn’t actual knowledge of the existence of a DBA.

The LPC also voted to support the study committee or Task Force on Abuse of the Elderly that is contemplated in SB 12-078, Protection of At-Risk Adults. The sponsor of the bill is searching ultimately for a way to move the reporting of elder abuse from the current state of “urge” to “mandatory” reporting. The fiscal impact for such a change has moved the focus from a substantive change in this legislation to finding solutions through the Task Force process.

Click here for the full e-Legislative Report.

SB 12-018: Creating Voluntary Alternative Medical Assistance Program for Medicaid-Eligible Elderly

On January 11, 2012, Sen. Lundberg introduced SB 12-018 – Concerning the development of an alternative medical assistance program for the elderly. This summary is published here courtesy of the Colorado Bar Association’s e-Legislative Report.

The bill creates a voluntary alternative medical assistance program for the Medicaid-eligible elderly. An eligible participant agrees to receive an amount equal to 70% of the medical assistance benefits that he or she would have received if the participant were enrolled in the state’s traditional Medicaid program in exchange for 2 features currently not allowed under the traditional Medicaid program:

  • The participant can choose any provider; and
  • The state waives the right to pursue all estate recovery methods from the participant’s family after the participant dies.

The participant’s physician assesses the level of care the participant needs. The department of health care policy and financing then determines the expected costs to provide that level of care if the participant were enrolled in and were receiving services under the traditional Medicaid program and allocates 70% of that amount annually to reimburse providers for the participant’s care. The department issues a debit card to the participant that is funded monthly with one-twelfth of the annual amount so allocated to the participant, which the participant uses to pay for medical services while enrolled in the alternative program. The eligible participant purchases long-term care services, assisted living services, home- and community-based services, home health services, prescribed drugs, or any health or dental care service at rates set by the provider, and the participant agrees to provide all additional resources needed for his or her care beyond the 70% Medicaid benefit amount provided through the program. The participant is responsible for researching and selecting the services.

Each year, the department conducts a redetermination of the participant’s eligibility for services and the participant’s physician reassesses the level of care that the participant needs. The department must seek a federal waiver for the program. Assigned to the Health and Human Services Committee.

Summaries of other featured bills can be found here.

2012 Medicaid Numbers Released by Colorado Department of Health Care Policy

On January 6, 2012, the Colorado Department of Health Care Policy and Financing released its 2012 Social Security Cost of Living Adjustments. According to the report, monthly Social Security and Supplemental Security Income benefits will increase by 3.6% in 2012. The 300% income limit, regional income trust maximum, Medicare premiums, home equity maximum, minimum monthly maintenance needs allowance maximum, and the community spouse resource allowance will also increase.

The following tables list the 2011 and 2012 income and resource limits for Adult and Long-Term Care Medicaid categories, regional income trust maximum, Medicare premiums, home equity maximum, minimum monthly maintenance needs allowance maximum, and the community spouse resource allowance.

Supplemental Security Income Limits

January 2011  January 2012
Individual in own home $674  $698
Individual in home of another $449.34  $465.34
Couple in own home $1,011  $1,048
Couple in home of another $674  $698
In-kind Support and Maintenance maximum (ISM) $244.66  $252.66
300% limit $2,022  $2,094

Nursing Facility

Income Trust Gross Income Limits and Average Private Pay Rate

January 2011 January 2012
Region I

Counties: Adams, Arapahoe, Boulder, Broomfield, Denver, and Jefferson

$6,914 $7,046
Region II

Counties: Cheyenne, Clear Creek, Douglas, Elbert, Gilpin, Grand, Jackson, Kit Carson, Larimer, Logan, Morgan, Park, Phillips, Sedgwick, Summit, Washington, Weld, and Yuma

$6,412 $6,690
Region III

Counties: Alamosa, Baca, Bent, Chaffee, Conejos, Costilla, Crowley, Custer, El Paso, Fremont, Huerfano, Kiowa, Lake, Las Animas, Lincoln, Mineral, Otero, Prowers, Pueblo, Rio Grande, Saguache, and Teller

$5,915 $6,190
Region IV

Counties: Archuleta, Delta, Dolores, Eatle, Garfield, Gunnison, Hinsdale, La Plata, Mesa, Moffat, Montezuma, Montrose, Ouray, Pitkin, Rio Blanco, Routt, San Juan, and San Miguel

$6,336 $6,566
Average Private Pay Rate $6,394 $6,623

Medicare

Medicare Part A – Hospital Insurance

Seniors and certain individuals under 65 with fewer than 30 work quarters of Medicare covered employment

$451
Medicare Part A – Hospital Insurance

Seniors over 65 with 30-39 quarters of Medicare covered employment

$289
Medicare Part B

Physician services, outpatient hospital services, certain home health services, durable medical equipment, and other items

$99.90
Medicare Skilled Nursing Facility Co-insurance

Days 21 thru 100 each benefit period

$144.50

Spousal Protection

January 1, 2011 January 1, 2012
Community Spouse Resource Allowance (CSRA) $109,560 $113,640
Minimum Monthly Maintenance Needs Allowance (Maximum) $2,739 $2,841

July 1, 2010 July 1, 2011
Minimum Monthly Maintenance Needs Allowance (MMMNA) $1,822 $1,839
Excess Shelter $547 $552

Home Equity Maximum

January 1, 2011 January 1, 2012
$506,000 $525,000

Contact Information: Medicaid.Eligibility@hcpf.state.co.us

Click here to review the full report.

Colorado’s Justice Crisis

It’s a perfect storm.  Although overused, that metaphor so accurately captures what is happening with respect to Colorado’s legal aid delivery system that it is difficult to avoid.  Just as in a perfect storm, a rare combination of circumstances has resulted in a crisis of unprecedented magnitude.

Colorado Legal Services (CLS) is the only program in the state that provides free legal assistance (advice, brief service, and full representation) in civil matters to low-income individuals and families in every Colorado county.  With 14 offices around the state, it operates like a legal emergency room, serving low income Coloradans at greatest risk and in greatest need.  In 2010 alone, CLS provided assistance to over 11,000 indigent clients facing serious legal problems that directly implicated their health, safety, stability and sufficiency.  With few exceptions, CLS clients live at or below 125% of the federal poverty guideline (which translates to an annual income of $13,613 for an individual and $27,938 for a family of four).  They include senior citizens, victims of domestic violence, veterans, persons with mental and physical disabilities, and other particularly vulnerable Coloradans.

Even before the recession, the need for legal aid among the poor outstripped available resources.  A study in 2005 found that for every client served by CLS, at least one person seeking help was turned away because of insufficient resources.  The Great Recession and its aftermath have made the situation dramatically worse, as more and more low-income Coloradans experience the significant legal problems that accompany acute economic distress and prolonged unemployment.  With the deterioration of the labor and housing markets, rising fuel and food costs, and depleted savings, more Coloradans are facing eviction, foreclosure, delinquent child support, hunger, financial distress, bankruptcy, and domestic violence.  In addition, prolonged un- or under-employment means that the number of people eligible for legal aid continues to rise.  The most recent Census Bureau survey found that there are now over 750,000 Coloradans who are income-eligible for services.

Amidst this rising tide of need, CLS is experiencing devastating funding losses that threaten to compromise its ability to meet even the most serious legal needs of the poor.  Federal funding, with strong bipartisan support, has long been a financial foundation for legal aid.  Yet, notwithstanding the increased need for legal services and the value of those services in stabilizing families in crisis, just before Thanksgiving, Congress approved a budget bill for 2012 that includes a 14.85% cut in funding for legal aid programs such as CLS.  This translates into a loss for Colorado of over $605,000.

This latest reduction in federal funding comes on top of other funding losses suffered over the last two years totaling nearly $1 million.  Most notable among these is the drop in funding from COLTAF, the Colorado Lawyer Trust Account Foundation.  The extended period of very low interest rates that we are experiencing (now expected to continue until at least mid-2013) has decimated COLTAF’s revenue, which is comprised solely of the interest earned on lawyers’ trust accounts, and although COLTAF has a reserve, built in better times for just such times as these, it is rapidly being depleted.  Even with the reserve, COLTAF funding for CLS has dropped by $630,000 over the course of the last two years, and COLTAF is projecting another cut to CLS of at least $520,000 in 2012.

Also important is a loss of $165,000 in state funding for legal services for victims of domestic violence.  Whether the state will be in a position to restore that funding for fiscal year 2013 remains to be seen, but an actual increase in the state appropriation, and certainly one anywhere near the magnitude necessary to cover for other losses, is not in the cards, given the state’s current budget constraints.  All told, by the end of 2012, CLS will likely be down over $2 million, or more than 20% of its funding just two years ago.

All of these funding losses mean that CLS, already woefully understaffed, will shrink further, which will necessarily reduce the legal assistance available to low-income Coloradans, regardless of their legal need.  Already, where there were six CLS lawyers doing family law cases in the Denver metro area, which has an indigent population of nearly 300,000, now there will be only five;  where there were four lawyers handling evictions and other housing issues, three will have to suffice; and where there were three doing foreclosure defense, now there will be two.  Other parts of the state are faring no better.  In Grand Junction, with an indigent population in Mesa County of about 17,000, there are now only two CLS lawyers, where formerly there were three.  The CLS offices in Colorado Springs and Alamosa have each lost a paralegal, and the Durango office has lost the sole member of its support staff, leaving just three lawyers and a paralegal to serve the entire southwest corner of the state, including the Southern Ute and Ute Mountain Ute Indian Reservations.  This serious understaffing is only going to get worse.

Bar-sponsored pro bono programs alone cannot be expected to pick up this much slack, particularly since they too are suffering from cuts in their COLTAF funding.  Nor can the court system, also suffering from inadequate funding, be expected to seamlessly absorb ever larger numbers of pro se litigants, especially if timely legal assistance would have eliminated the need for them to be there in the first place.  It is true that to maximize access for those in greatest need, a well-functioning civil legal aid delivery system must have well-managed pro bono programs; it must have a legal community committed to providing pro bono services to the poor; it must have self-help resources that make courts and administrative agencies accessible for those who are proceeding pro se; and it must maximize its use of technology to improve access in rural areas and otherwise.  But the backbone of any well-functioning system must be an adequately-funded, staffed legal aid program, with lawyers and paralegals, who are expert in dealing with the problems unique to low-income populations, and who are available on demand when low-income families are in crisis and time is of the essence.

The legal profession has a singular responsibility to respond to this crisis in our civil justice system.  CLS is the place of last resort for low-income families, the disabled, veterans and military families, and seniors who are facing serious civil legal problems.  If turned away, these Coloradans are effectively denied the rights, remedies, and protections afforded by the law, sometimes with devastating consequences – lethal injuries at the hands of an abusive spouse, a home lost to an unscrupulous lender, life on the street because of a wrongful denial of disability benefits.  As lawyers, we understand that the rule of law is in jeopardy when the protections of the law are not available to increasingly large numbers of our most vulnerable citizens.

The leadership of lawyers – whether in private practice or in-house corporate counsel, large firm or solo practice, government or nonprofit – is more important than ever in fulfilling our nation’s promise of equal justice for all.  The effect of CLS’ funding losses is calculable in terms of dollars lost, staff positions eliminated, and additional applicants for service turned away.  But the actual impact on the lives of low-income Coloradans, the damage to our communities, the tarnishing of our nation’s fundamental promise of equal justice, and the risk to our civil justice system and the rule of law is immeasurable.

Here are some things you can do to help:

  1. Give generously to the Legal Aid Foundation (http://www.legalaidfoundation.org/).
  2. Take a pro bono case from Metro Volunteer Lawyers (http://www.metrovolunteerlawyers.org/).
  3. Speak to your elected representatives (federal and state) about the importance of public funding for civil justice.
  4. Speak with your banker to ensure that the interest rate on your COLTAF account is as generous as possible.
Diana Poole is the Executive Director of the Legal Aid Foundation, which raises money for Colorado Legal Services, and COLTAF, which administers Colorado’s IOLTA program. She is also a member of the Colorado Access to Justice Commission.

Spark the Discussion: Medical Marijuana Law and Policy

“Spark the Discussion” is a monthly Legal Connection column highlighting the hottest trends in the emerging field of medical marijuana law. This column is brought to you by Vicente Sederberg, LLC, a full-service, community-focused medical marijuana law firm.

I’ll start with a bold prediction: marijuana reform and same-sex marriage are the two policy areas in which young lawyers will see major movement in their lifetimes. These two “controversial” topics stand at the crossroads of a shift in society, with the younger generation pushing for increased tolerance of alternative lifestyles—whether it’s marriage choice or an individual’s decision to medicate—or recreate—with marijuana—and older Americans increasingly accepting that, at least with these two topics, change is inevitable.

This article will focus on medical marijuana law and policy—a dynamic field that an increasing number of Colorado lawyers are facing in their everyday practice. Currently, sixteen states (and the District of Columbia) have passed statewide medical marijuana laws, and a half-dozen others are poised to take similar action. What started largely as an area within criminal law practice—a small number of lawyers defending medical marijuana patients accused of criminal violations—has expanded into a cottage industry impacting nearly every area of legal practice. This column will highlight some of those areas and discuss the future of this hot topic.

Before reading further, please note that while medical marijuana is legal in Colorado and a growing number of states, and literally thousands of doctors recommend it every year for sick patients, it remains firmly illegal under federal law. Given these conflicting state and federal stances, it’s crucial that lawyers practicing in this area closely follow emerging trends and policies.

  • Business Law:
  • Colorado and several other states have medical marijuana laws with provisions allowing for retail stores known as dispensaries to sell marijuana to qualifying patients.  Budding entrepreneurs need guidance from attorneys who understand not only medical marijuana laws, but also traditional business law. All facets of corporate law, from drafting  operating agreements to negotiating commercial transactions, come into play with the operation of dispensaries.
  • Family Law:
  • An increasingly common theme in the family law realm is the presence of medical marijuana in custody battles or divorce proceedings. Often these disputes arise not from actual neglect or abuse, but merely from the presence of marijuana in the home. Patients need solid guidance to keep this—and all medicine—firmly away from children. There is a desperate need for lawyers who understand both medical marijuana law and family law and can advocate appropriately when the two areas overlap.
  • Elder Law:
  • As medical marijuana patients age they often end up in nursing homes or in-patient hospice care. When Maine’s medical marijuana law changed last November, the state expressly permitted nursing homes and hospice workers to act as registered medical marijuana caregivers for patients. Other states are silent on this issue. Large questions remain about federal funding for this type of care and how one patient’s possession of a federally-illegal substance could place others at legal risk.
  • Civil Law:
  • Legal medical marijuana businesses have the same problems as other, more mainstream businesses, and partnership disputes by owners of such stores are commonplace in Colorado. Some owners came out of a less-mainstream past, and built a million-dollar business without signing an operating agreement. In these messy situations, civil litigation is often the only remedy.
  • Election and Municipal Law:
  • The passage of a statewide medical marijuana law is invariably followed by conservative municipalities attempting to ban sales and cultivation within municipal borders. When Colorado passed a dispensary law in 2010, around 50 municipalities put measures on their local ballots to ban these retail shops in their communities. Whether through ballot initiative or action by a government body, there is a real opportunity for lawyers who understand election and municipal law to engage in this area.
  • First Amendment:
  • The most common complaint from community members about dispensaries is that they have offensive signage. While polls consistently show that roughly 80% of Americans support medical marijuana, most citizens don’t want it shoved in their face. Medical marijuana business owners need lawyers to explain their rights—and encourage discretion.
  • Intellectual Property Law:
  • “Can we patent the recipe for my marijuana cheesecake?” This question may seem peculiar, but my office gets several calls a week of this nature. As more patients turn to alternate forms of administering medical marijuana, such as through edibles or tinctures, interesting questions arise concerning protecting the manufacturer’s recipes and formulas.
  • Criminal Law:
  • As long as federal law continues to classify marijuana as a Schedule I Controlled Substance—the most dangerous and addictive class of drugs—there will be work for criminal defense attorneys representing medical marijuana patients and providers in federal court. On the state and local level, authorities continue to zealously target adults for marijuana crimes,  arresting over 750,000 citizens for possession of marijuana annually. That’s the equivalent of arresting every man, woman, and child in the state of Wyoming once a year!

As young attorneys in Colorado, we have an incredible opportunity in the field of medical marijuana law. Unlike property law or criminal law, this area is new and has very little case precedent. The young idealist attorney will fight out these important cases in the courtroom and establish laws that make sense both for the patient and the community.

Many lawyers initially chose this patient-centered line of work because they believed the time had come to pursue a more common-sense approach to marijuana and drug policy in America. Now, as lawyers from a diverse range of practice areas are entering this arena, let’s hope all remain true to the core principles that attracted most of us to this work:

Patients before politics; patients before profits.
Brian Vicente, Esq., is a founding member of Vicente Consulting, LLC, a law firm providing legal solutions for the medical marijuana community. He also serves as executive director of Sensible Colorado, the state’s leading non-profit working for medical marijuana patients and providers. Brian is the chair of the Denver Mayor’s Marijuana Policy Review Panel, serves on the Colorado Department of Revenue Medical Marijuana Oversight Panel, and coordinates the Colorado Bar Association’s Drug Policy Project.

Team CBA-CLE Scores a “Hat Trick” with Three International Awards, Including One for Legal Connection

The staff of Colorado Bar Association Continuing Legal Education (CBA-CLE) has so many enthusiastic hockey fans (including recreational players, coaches, referees, and those who just watch) that we thought it appropriate to have a hockey theme to celebrate when we won three awards in 2011. The “Hat Trick” from the international organization, the Association for Continuing Legal Education (ACLEA), included awards in the categories of Publications, Technology (for this blog!), and Public Interest.

Dawn McKnight, Assistant Executive Director of CBA-CLE says, “Our staff does an incredible job and we could not have won the awards without the help of the hundreds of attorneys and legal professionals in Colorado who contribute their time and resources to the projects.  There are too many people to name that volunteer countless hours for us, but we are extremely grateful and lucky to work with such talented and dedicated people. It’s very rewarding to be recognized by this international organization for the work we do and especially to win three in one year!  We’ll continue to work hard to achieve our ‘goals’ of providing quality legal education programs and publications for our legal community.”

2011 ACLEA AWARDS

  • Public Service Category:   Senior Law Day Project
  • Senior Law Day is an annual event for the public, held in several different locations each year around the state and offers workshops taught by attorneys and other professionals on critical topics  to seniors including Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security, Estate Planning and many other issues.
  • Publications Category:   Residential Construction Law in Colorado, Third Edition
  • Written by noted attorneys Ronald M. Sandgrund, Scott F. Sullan, and Leslie A. Tuft, this timely and well-written book reviews critical issues with homeowners’ legal rights and remedies arising from the design, construction, marketing, and sale of single-family homes and multi-family communities.
  • Technology Category:   CBA-CLE Legal Connection Blog – www.cbaclelegalconnection.com
  • A free resource for the Colorado legal community to get the latest Colorado legal news easier and faster from one centralized, searchable resource.

DEFINITION OF A HAT TRICK: Three goals scored by one player in a single game.

ABOUT ACLEA: Established in 1964, ACLEA is an international association providing educational opportunities and professional interaction for its members.  The organization includes members in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, Australia, New Zealand, Africa, and Mexico. Administrators, trainers, managers, educators, publishers, programmers and meeting professionals are all members of ACLEA.

ABOUT CBA-CLE:  Colorado Bar Association CLE [CBA-CLE] is the nonprofit education arm of the Colorado Bar Association and the Denver Bar Association. We produce high-quality continuing legal education programs and legal publications for attorneys and legal professionals in Colorado and the Rocky Mountain Region.

State Board of Human Services Amends Home Care Allowance and Adult Foster Care Rules

The Colorado State Board of Human Services has proposed rules to implement requirements of HB 10-1146, effective January 1, 2011, regarding Home Care Allowance and Adult Foster Care. These proposed rules focus on three elements:

  • Recipients of Supplemental Security Income to receive a full Home Care Allowance benefit;
  • Changes existing eligibility rules for dual recipients of Home Care Allowance, Adult Foster Care, and other long-term care programs; and
  • Changes in responsibilities of the county financial technicians in relation to the Home Care Allowance and Adult Foster Care programs.

The changes implemented in HB 10-1146 required changes to the Colorado Benefits Management System that could not be completed until January 2012.  Therefore, there has been a delay to implement for one year from the effective date of the bill.

Currently, any Home Care Allowance applicants or recipients can be eligible to receive both Home Care Allowance benefits and Home and Community Based waiver services.  Due to changes in statute, the rules will reflect that recipients will not be allowed to receive benefits from both the Home Care Allowance and Home and Community Based Services simultaneously.  This will require current recipients to choose a single benefit program.

As of January 1, 2011, eligibility will be expanded to include Supplemental Security Income (SSI) recipients who receive the maximum SSI benefit.  It is anticipated that many new persons will benefit from the rule changes, such as the developmentally disabled persons who are currently on waitlists for HCBS waiver services and who may be able to utilize Home Care Allowance in the interim.

A hearing on the proposed rules will be held on Friday, November 4, 2011 at the Colorado Department of Human Services, 1575 Sherman Street, Conference Room 4A/B, Denver, Colorado 80203, beginning at 10:00 am.

Full text of the proposed rules including red line edits can be found here. Further information about the rules and hearing can be found here.

Department of Human Services Finds Thousands of Rules to Repeal or Revise

On Thursday, September 8, 2011, Governor John Hickenlooper announced that the Colorado Department of Human Services is poised to recommend the repeal of nearly 850 rules that are unnecessary or outdated and the revision of another 2,000 rules.

“Our commitment to cutting red tape and finding appropriate levels of regulation is no secret,” Hickenlooper said. “These proposed changes will help streamline operations in the Department of Human Services. Other state agencies are going through similar reviews of their rules as we work together to make state government more effective and efficient.”

The recommendations follow a comprehensive review of more than 4,300 rules by 63 Human Services employees over the past several months. The effort was the most extensive rule review ever undertaken by the Department of Human Services, which regulates child care centers, foster homes, child protection services, mental health programs, services for individuals with disabilities, and senior services.

Human Services employees received special training to review agency rules for clarity, necessity, and conciseness and were directed to recommend for repeal or revision those rules found to be duplicative, inconsistent, or burdensome. The same scrutiny will be applied to proposed rules for child care centers that are currently working through a public input process.

The department will recommend to the State Human Services Board the repeal of 841 rules and the revision of an additional 2,116.

Some of the rule changes being considered are:

  • Six rules concerning the operation of the County Veterans Service Officer Program, which will be repealed as this program was moved by statute to the Department of Veterans and Military Affairs in 2002.
  • A rule concerning drug precursors, which will be repealed because its statutory foundation was repealed in 1992.
  • Rules for the Colorado Refugee Services Program, which will be revised to more accurately state the categories of individuals eligible for refugee services and the section of federal law that creates the eligibility.

All of the recommendations must now be presented to the State Board of Human Services for approval. The Board’s next meeting is Friday, September 9.

Click here to read the full release from the Governor’s Office regarding the rules.