May 20, 2013

Honorable Jane A. Tidball to Retire from First Judicial District Bench

TidballOn Monday, May 13, 2013, the Colorado State Judicial Branch announced that the Honorable Jane A. Tidball will retire from the First Judicial District court bench, effective July 31, 2013. The First Judicial District Nominating Commission will meet on June 28, 2013, to interview applicants and select nominees for appointment to the bench.

Judge Tidball was appointed to the First Judicial District Court in 1998. Prior to that, she was a District Court Magistrate in the Twentieth Judicial District. She also serves on the Colorado Supreme Court Civil Rules Committee, has written several legal articles, and has spoken at CLE programs.

Applicants for the vacancy must have been admitted to practice law in Colorado for five years, and must be qualified electors in the First Judicial District. Applications are available on the Colorado State Judicial Branch website, and must be submitted to the ex officio chair of the nominating commission, Justice Monica Marquez, no later than 4 p.m. on June 10, 2013.

For more details on the vacancy and application process, click here.

Colorado Court of Appeals: Board of County Commissioners Has Authority to Determine Permitted Uses of Property for Zoning Purposes

The Colorado Court of Appeals issued its opinion in Giuliani v. Jefferson County Board of County Commissioners on Thursday, November 1, 2012.

Medical Marijuana—Local Zoning—Summary Judgment—Colorado Constitution, Amendment 20—Mootness—Medical Marijuana Code.

In this action concerning whether a county may prohibit the operation of a medical marijuana dispensary as a non-permitted use under a local zoning plan, plaintiffs Marc Giuliani and Footprints Health and Wellness, Inc. (collectively, providers) and Christopher Peck and Frank Campbell (collectively, patients) appealed the trial court’s orders partially dismissing their claims and affirming the resolution of the Jefferson County Board of Adjustment (Board). They also appealed the trial court’s summary judgment in favor of defendants, the Jefferson County Board of County Commissioners (BOCC), the Board, and the Jefferson County Division of Planning and Zoning (collectively, County). The appeal was dismissed in part, the judgment was affirmed in part, and the order was affirmed.

The providers leased a commercial unit in a shopping center in unincorporated Jefferson County in September 2009 for the purpose of operating a medical marijuana dispensary. Believing this use would be compatible with the official development plan (ODP) of the shopping center, as zoned, the providers hired a contractor to perform tenant improvements and obtained various permits from Jefferson County.

The business opened in late October 2009. Two months later, the zoning administrator issued a zoning violation notice to the providers, stating the operation of a medical marijuana dispensary was not a permitted use in the zone district. The providers appealed to the Board, which affirmed the administrator’s conclusion.

In May 2010, the providers filed this action, seeking declaratory and injunctive relief and money damages. In March 2011, the patients were permitted to intervene and joined the providers’ claim that the County was preempted by Amendment 20 to the Colorado Constitution from interpreting its zoning regulations so as to impose a de facto ban on medical marijuana dispensaries.

The trial court granted in part the County’s motion to partially dismiss the complaint and denied the request for a preliminary injunction. It also affirmed the Board’s resolution that the dispensary was not a permitted use. It then granted the County’s motion for summary judgment on all remaining claims.

Amendment 20, passed in November 2000, permits patients to possess and use medical marijuana without criminal prosecution in certain circumstances. In the 2010 legislative session, the Colorado Medical Marijuana Code (Code) was enacted. Pursuant to authority granted in the Code, the BOCC approved a resolution in July 2010 prohibiting businesses that cultivate, manufacture, or sell marijuana or marijuana products within unincorporated Jefferson County. None of the parties addressed how the Code affected the issues they raised on appeal, and the Court of Appeals therefore requested supplemental briefing to determine whether the claims were moot in light of the Code’s enactment.

The County asserted that any claims for prospective relief were moot because the Code would prevent the providers from operating the dispensary in unincorporated Jefferson County. The Court agreed.

The Court held that even if it assumed that Amendment 20 created a constitutional right to distribute marijuana for medical use and to receive in from a provider of one’s choice, such rights are not unfettered. Here, the request for declaratory and injunctive relief would have no practical legal effect because of the County’s July 2010 ban on dispensaries and the Code’s requirement that all existing and new dispensaries operate their businesses in accordance with applicable state or local laws. Thus, even without the ban, the providers would have needed to apply and be approved by a local licensing authority. Such approval cannot be obtained under the ban; therefore, the claims for injunctive and declaratory relief are moot.

Alternatively, the patients and providers claimed they were “grandfathered” under CRS § 38-1-101. The Court disagreed. The statute limits the broad land-use-planning authority of counties by prohibiting a local government from enacting or enforcing an ordinance, resolution, or regulation in such a way that terminates or eliminates by amortization a nonconforming property use that was lawful at its inception. Here, assuming the statute applies, the dispensary was not lawful in 2009; therefore, there was no basis for it to be lawfully grandfathered.

The providers argued it was error to dismiss their equitable estoppel claim because the Colorado Governmental Immunity Act (CGIA) does not apply to claims seeking injunctive and declaratory relief. The Court disagreed. Equitable estoppel applies where a plaintiff detrimentally relies on a defendant’s misstatement of fact. It lies in tort. Here, the providers claimed the County led them to reasonably believe a dispensary was a permitted use on their property. Thus, the claim was a tort claim and it was not error to dismiss it under the CGIA (the nature of the damages sought is immaterial).

The providers also contended it was error to dismiss their money damages claims for the County’s violations of their due process, equal protection, and article XVIII, § 14, rights under the Colorado Constitution. The Court disagreed. The due process clause of the Colorado Constitution does not create an implied cause of action in damages. Equal treatment under the laws in Colorado is a right under the due process clause. The providers thus have no entitlement to money damages for state due process and equal protection claims.

The providers further argued that the Board impermissibly based its decision on a de facto ban on dispensaries. Because the Board reasonably concluded the dispensary was not a use expressly contemplated by the zoning resolution, the Court found no abuse of discretion. The appeal was dismissed with respect to the patients’ and providers’ claims for declaratory and injunctive relief. In all other respects, the judgment was affirmed.

Summary and full case available here.

Ryan James Stuart and Jean Woodford Appointed as New Judges in Jefferson County

On Thursday, July 12, 2012, Governor John Hickenlooper announced his appointments of Ryan James Stuart and Jean Woodford to serve as county court judges in the First Judicial District, which covers Jefferson County. Stuart will fill the judgeship created by the retirement of Honorable John A. DeVita II and Woodford will fill the judgeship created pursuant to HB 12-1073.

Stuart’s judicial appointment is effective August 31 and Woodford’s is effective immediately.

Stuart is currently a District Court Magistrate in the First Judicial District where the majority of his docket consists of domestic relations cases and some dependency and neglect cases. Prior to becoming a Magistrate Judge, Stuart was a Deputy District Attorney in the First Judicial District Attorney’s Office. He also practiced civil litigation as an associate at Davis Graham & Stubbs and Brownstein Hyatt & Farber.

Woodford currently works for the Colorado Attorney General’s Office as the First Assistant Attorney General, a position she has held since 2004. Woodford is responsible for the Financial Fraud Unit, which investigates and prosecutes securities fraud, insurance fraud, and auto theft. Previously, she worked as Acting District Attorney for the Seventh Judicial District and as Assistant District Attorney.

Finalists Selected to Fill Judgeships on Jefferson County Court

The First Judicial District Nominating Commission has nominated six candidates for two Jefferson County court judgeships. One was created pursuant to HB 12-1073, effective July 1, 2012, and the other by the retirement of the Honorable John A. DeVita II, effective August 31.

The nominees for the bench are Harold Sargent and Thomas Walsh, both of Lakewood, Joel Schaefer and AnnMarie Spain, both of Arvada, Ryan Stuart of Littleton, and Jean Woodford of unincorporated Jefferson County. All were selected by the Commission on June 27, 2012.

Under the Colorado Constitution, Governor Hickenlooper has until July 13 to appoint two of the nominees as county court judges for Jefferson County.

Judge John A. DeVita II Retiring from Jefferson County Court Court Bench

The First Judicial District Nominating Commission will meet at the Jefferson County Courthouse on Wednesday, June 27, 2012, to interview and select nominees for appointment by Governor Hickenlooper to the office of County Judge for Jefferson County. The vacancy will be created by the retirement of the Honorable John A. DeVita II on August 31.

Eligible applicants for appointment to fill the vacancy must be qualified electors of Jefferson County and must be admitted to the practice of law in Colorado. Applications must be received by Monday, June 11. The appointed county court judge will serve an initial provisional term of two years before facing a retention election. If retained in the general election, judges serve four-year terms.

Further information about applying for the vacancy is available here from the Colorado Judicial Branch.

First Judicial District Announces New Jefferson County Court Judgeship

The First Judicial District Nominating Commission will meet on Wednesday, June 27, 2012, to interview and select nominees for appointment by Governor Hickenlooper to the office of County Judge for Jefferson County. The new county court judgeship was created pursuant to HB 12-1073 and is effective July 1.

Eligible applicants for appointment to fill the vacancy must be qualified electors of Jefferson County and must be admitted to the practice of law in Colorado. Applications must be received by Monday, June 11. The appointed district court judge will serve an initial provisional term of two years before facing a retention election. Retained judges serve four-year terms.

Further information about applying for the vacancy is available here from the Colorado Judicial Branch.

Governor Hickenlooper Appoints Zenisek to First Judicial District Court

On Wednesday, December 21, 2011, Governor John Hickenlooper announced his appointment of Christopher Clayton Zenisek to serve as a district court judge in the First Judicial District, serving Jefferson and Gilpin counties. The appointment is effective immediately.

Zenisek will fill the vacancy created by the appointment of the Honorable Brian Boatright to the Colorado Supreme Court.

Zenisek, of Golden, currently serves as an Assistant District Attorney for the Twentieth Judicial District, a position he has held since 2009. Previously, Zenisek worked an associate at Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, P.C., and served as a law clerk for United States District Judge Lewis Babcock. Zenisek earned his bachelor’s degree from University of Colorado and his law degree from the University of Denver.

The Life and Times of Brian Boatright: An Interview with the Newest Colorado Supreme Court Justice

I have had the privilege of knowing the newest justice on the Colorado Supreme Court for over 17 years, since September of 1994, when I was hired as a deputy district attorney in Jefferson County.  Brian Boatright was a senior deputy then, prosecuting felony cases in district court.  One of the first memories I have of him was as an instructor of mine at “Baby DA School,” teaching evidence and procedure.  Even then, it was obvious to me that this was a really smart guy.  Scary smart.  In 2006, I joined him as a colleague on the First Judicial District bench.  I recently had the chance to sit down with Justice Boatright for an in-depth chat, something I wish I had done long ago.

Justice Boatright points to his father, an extremely well-respected and honored attorney, for having the biggest impact on his life.  He credits his dad with teaching him humility, and passing on a work ethic that has guided and shaped his career and life.  Professionally, Senior Judge Michael Villano (his godfather), played a huge role in setting the highest example for judicial temperament and demeanor for Justice Boatright to follow.  Judge Villano administered the oath to Justice Boatright at his ceremonial swearing-in at the state capitol on December 13, 2011.

He mentions former Governor Bill Ritter as someone who made a significant impact on him.  When Justice Boatright was nominated as a county court judge, he was told that talking to then-Denver DA Ritter regarding his upcoming interview with Governor Romer would be a good idea.  Brian is still astounded that, although they knew each other only slightly at the time, DA Ritter spent over 45 minutes with him, conducting a mock interview.  Having someone going out of their way for a virtual stranger like that made an impression on Brian that hasn’t faded many years later.

Justice Boatright served as a district court judge in Jefferson County for over ten years.  For the last several years before his appointment to the Supreme Court, he was overseeing a dedicated juvenile docket.  It is his devotion to juvenile issues and children that perhaps defines Justice Boatright the best.  He will miss seeing the joy that resulted from a successful adoption or a positive end to a dependency and neglect case with a family being reunited.  Being a parent had a huge impact on his handling of juvenile cases, giving perspective on virtually every decision.  In recognition of his tireless work on behalf of children, Jefferson County has named a playground at the Human Services Building the Honorable Brian Boatright Playground.

From a long and varied career, Justice Boatright has several ideas regarding the legal profession and the role of the judiciary.  A book he recommends to judges or those interested in the bench is Blink by Malcolm Gladwell.  It deals with preconceived notions, an issue that can obviously impact decisions from the bench.  Interestingly, Governor Hickenlooper has read the book, and it was mentioned during the Supreme Court appointment process by the governor.  One example of the problems preconceived notions can create was a situation that came up during Justice Boatright’s juvenile docket.  He was dealing with a difficult termination of parental rights case where the mother came across as “rough” with a questionable lifestyle.  During the proceedings, Justice Boatright started to question his initial impressions of this woman, wondering if the way she presented herself was prejudicing him against her.  He began to think the termination case might be more based upon her poverty instead of her inability to be a good parent.  In the end, he denied the petition, and did not terminate this mother’s parental rights, despite his initial perception of her.

Justice Boatright would like the attorneys who will be appearing in front of him, as well as all the citizens of Colorado, to know that he respects the separation of powers so fundamental to our system.  He trusts the law, and he trusts in our system of justice.  He knows he’s starting a new phase of his career in which people will likely disagree with him at times, but to the Colorado legal community, he sends the following: he will apply the law to the utmost of his ability, no matter the case or issue.  He is clearly honored to be appointed to the Colorado Supreme Court.  I feel the honor is ours.

Little-known facts and trivia about Justice Brian Boatright:

  • His dream job?  General Manager of the Colorado Rockies.
  • In the third grade, he appeared in a commercial for JetEx, where he was supposed to say “My dad wears a polka-dotted tie.”  He couldn’t say “polka-dotted,” settling for “poka-a-dot” tie.  He made $25 for the commercial, although he still seems bitter that his parents took 75% of that as his “agents.”  His potential drama career sadly ended after he played Snoopy in a middle school production of “You’re a Good Man, Charlie Brown.”  He seemed strangely reluctant to discuss this episode of his life.
  • He can remember and sing all the words to the Schoolhouse Rock classic “I’m Just a Bill.”  (“I’m just a bill, yes I’m only a bill, and I’m sitting here on Capitol Hill . . . .”). Don’t read anything into the fact that he makes no such claim about the Schoolhouse Rock song about the preamble to the U.S. Constitution.  I’m sure he knows the preamble.  Well, pretty sure anyway.
  • Eating apples make him sweat.  The tarter the apple, the more he sweats.  (Good information for attorneys practicing before the Supreme Court to have.  If you’re planning to bring apples to the justices, a la one for the teacher in school, best to leave Justice Boatright out.  Or bring a very sweet apple.)  He views this . . . ability?  Talent? I’m not sure what to call it . . . as a “good party trick.”  I don’t know what sort of parties he goes to.  Or will get invited to now.
  • Despite last season, he still thinks CU joining the Pac-12 was a good idea.  Clearly, he has trouble leaving some irrational thoughts behind.  (I’m guessing Governor Hickenlooper didn’t ask him this question.)
  • He has thus far resisted the temptation to wear his purple Rockies robe, but doesn’t rule out wearing it if they win the World Series.
  • I’m exercising some discretion, and will not disclose his response to the classic “boxers or briefs?” question.  Just use your imagination here, dear reader.
  • He advises trial judges that he may reverse just so they can have the same attitude he had when he was reversed.  (Not that he was ever reversed.)  That attitude?  “Wow – the upper court really got it right!”
  • His most embarrassing moment on the bench?  (So far.)  When he was presiding over an allocation of parental responsibilities hearing and asked to no one in particular, “Who entered the APR order in this case?”  Following an awkward silence, his long-time clerk Sonya said, “You did. Two weeks ago.”  His response?  “Oh.”
  • His favorite saying while on the bench?  “Closed mouth gathers no foot.”
  • He wanted me to make clear that his brother is older than he is.  Much older.
  • For someone who has shot to the top of his profession, he has a surprisingly lousy sense of direction.  When we finished this interview at Buffalo Wild Wings after two hours or so (and, let’s be clear – no alcohol.  Just iced tea and Coke.  Honest.), Justice Boatright went completely the wrong way and tried to exit the restaurant through the back wall.

My deepest thanks and appreciation to the entire First Judicial District bench for their ideas for questions to their former colleague.  Special acknowledgement to Judge Margie Enquist, who tipped me off about the apple issue, the “poka-a-dot,” and the Bill song.  Justice Boatright expressed that his greatest regret about his appointment is leaving all these great folks behind.  I understand why he feels that way.

Bradley A. Burback is a county court judge in the First Judicial District.

Finalists Selected to Fill Judgeship on First Judicial District Court

The First Judicial District Nominating Commission has nominated three candidates for a district court judgeship created by the appointment of the Honorable Brian Boatright to the Colorado Supreme Court, effective November 18, 2011.

The nominees for the bench are Harold Sargent of Lakewood, Marianne Tims of Littleton, and Christopher Zenisek of Golden. All were selected by the Commission on December 5, 2011.

Under the Colorado Constitution, Governor Hickenlooper has until December 21, 2011 to appoint one of the nominees as District Court Judge for the First Judicial District, serving Gilpin and Jefferson counties.

Comments regarding any of the nominees can be emailed to the Governor’s Office.

Vacancy on the First Judicial District Court Following Judge Boatright’s Appointment to the Colorado Supreme Court

The First Judicial District Nominating Commission will meet December 5, 2011, at the Jefferson County Combined Court to interview and select nominees for appointment by Governor Hickenlooper to the office of District Judge for the First Judicial District, which serves Gilpin and Jefferson counties. The vacancy will be created by the appointment of the Honorable Brian Boatright to the Colorado Supreme Court.  The vacancy will occur on November 18.

Eligible applicants for appointment to fill the vacancy must be qualified electors of the First Judicial District and must have been admitted to the practice of law in Colorado for five years. Applications must be received by Thursday, November 17. The appointed district judge will serve an initial provisional term of two years before facing a retention election. Retained judges serve six-year terms.

Further information about applying for the vacancy is available from the Colorado Judicial Branch.

Judge Munsinger Appointed as Chief Judge of First Judicial District

Today, Colorado Supreme Court Chief Justice Michael L. Bender announced that he has appointed the Honorable Stephen M. Munsinger as the new chief judge for the First Judicial District, which serves Gilpin and Jefferson counties.

Judge Munsinger will replace Chief Judge R. Brooke Jackson, who is leaving the District Court following his appointment to the U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado.

Judge Munsinger’s appointment becomes effective on September 1, 2011. He was appointed to the District Court bench in July 2001 and previously worked in private practice, in the U.S. Attorney’s Office, and in the Denver District Attorney’s Office.

Each of Colorado’s twenty-two judicial districts has a chief judge. In that roll, Judge Munsinger will serve as the administrative head of the First Judicial District. He will be responsible for appointing the district administrator, chief probation officer, and clerks of the court, assisting in the personnel, financial and case-management duties of the district, and seeing that the business of the courts is conducted efficiently and effectively. Other responsibilities include judicial assignments within the district.

Click here to read the full press release regarding the appointment from State Judicial.

Jefferson County to Graduate Largest Class Yet from its Recovery Court

The Jefferson County Recovery Court marks a milestone on Friday, August 12, 2011 when three participants are scheduled to graduate from the program, its largest graduation yet since beginning two years ago.

Four classes have graduated so far from the Recovery Court, which is essentially a Drug Court (similar to adult drug courts found in about twenty other counties around the state) but with the addition of a restorative justice component. Participants must complete an eighteen-month intensive-treatment program that includes probation supervision, in-court review hearings, substantial judicial oversight, and full accountability by the Recovery Court participant.

Unlike many other drug court programs, however, the Jefferson County Recovery Court requires each participant to create a restorative justice program as part of his or her treatment plan. Participants design and carry out community-service projects intended to repair some of the harm they have caused through their drug use and previous criminal behavior.

Friday’s graduates developed and implemented the following court-approved projects:

  • Creation of a menu and assistance with food preparation plans and service at the Denver Rescue Mission
  • Organization of a food-donation program involving a Honey Baked Ham store to benefit local shelters
  • Volunteer work at the Aspen Center for Women.

The graduation hearing will be held at the Jefferson County Combined Courts, 100 Jefferson County Parkway, Courtroom 5C, beginning at noon.

The Jefferson County Recovery Court is one of more than sixty problem-solving courts operating in seventeen of Colorado’s twenty-two judicial districts. Colorado’s problem-solving courts include adult and juvenile drug courts, family/dependency and neglect drug courts, DUI courts, adult and juvenile mental health courts, a veteran trauma court, and truancy courts.

Click here to read the full press release from State Judicial.

Protected

2013-05-20 03:55:09