May 18, 2013

e-Legislative Report: January 28, 2013

CBA Director of Legislative Relations Michael Valdez discusses Martin Luther King Jr. Day, honoring veterans, and the status of the civil unions bill in this week’s video legislative update.

Senate Judiciary Gives SB 11—Civil Unions Initial Okay

On Wednesday, Jan. 23, after several hours of testimony, the Senate Judiciary Committee approved SB 11 and moved the bill to the Appropriations Committee for consideration of the fiscal implications of the bill. The CBA went on record for the second year to support the legislation. Several substantive sections of the Bar Association have supported the passage of this legislation and are continually reviewing the bill for possible technical corrections amendments. Technical amendments were adopted by the Senate Judiciary Committee to comply with the “Rule of 7” days statutory time calculations.

The House of Representatives Gave Final House Approval of Two Technical “Legal” Bills on Wednesday, Jan. 23:

  1. HB 13–1077. Concerning the enactment of Colorado Revised Statutes 2012 as the positive and statutory law of the state of Colorado was approved on a vote of 63 yes, 0 no and 2 excused; and
  2. HB 13–1029. Concerning the use of authority verbs in the Colorado Revised Statutes was approved on a vote of 63 yes, 0 no and 2 excused.

Friday, Jan. 25—Military Day at the Capitol

The House and Senate paid tribute to veterans during the annual Military Day series of Resolutions:

  • HJR13–1006. Concerning recognition of Military, Veterans, and MIA/POW Appreciation Day.
  • HJR13–1008. Concerning the U.S.S. Pueblo.
  • HJR13–1009. Concerning the designation of the Leopard Creek bridge in Placerville as the “Pfc. Paul L. Haining Memorial Bridge.”
  • HJR13–1012. Concerning the designation of National Guard and Reserve retirees as veterans.
  • HJR13–1010. Concerning recognizing the 60th anniversary of the armistice marking the end of the Korean War.
  • HJR13-1011.Concerning recognition of military personnel from Colorado who have served in Operation New Dawn and Operation Enduring Freedom and in the Global War on Terrorism, and honoring those who have died while serving their country in Iraq, Afghanistan, and elsewhere around the world.

CBA Legislative Policy Committee

For readers who are new to CBA legislative activity, the Legislative Policy Committee (LPC) is the CBA’s legislative policy-making arm during the legislative session. The LPC meets weekly during the legislative session to determine CBA positions on requests from the various sections and committees of the Bar Association.

At the meeting on Friday, Jan. 25, the LPC voted to take action on several bills at its weekly meeting:

  1. The Committee voted to support HB 13–1016. Concerning the distribution to beneficiaries of amounts in pay-on-death (POD) financial institution accounts pursuant to written designation in the records of the financial institution;
  2. The Committee voted to oppose HB 13–1032. Concerning offenses against an unborn child and HB 13–1033. Concerning a prohibition on abortion.

Stay tuned to CBA-CLE Legal Connection for summaries of ten bills of interest.

HB 13-1011: Elimination of the Fee to Add Veteran Identifier to Driver’s License or State ID Card

On Wednesday, January 9, 2013, Rep. Dave Young and Sen. Evie Hudak introduced HB 13-1011 - Concerning the Repeal of the Fee for the Branch-of-Service Identifier on Cards Issued by the Department of Revenue. This summary is published here courtesy of the Colorado Bar Association’s e-Legislative Report.

Transportation Legislation Review Committee.

The bill repeals the fee currently charged to a member of the armed services for the branch-of-service identifier on a Colorado driver’s license or state identification card. Assigned to the Transportation and Energy Committee.

HB 13-1008: Extending Veterans’ Hiring Preference to Spouse of Veteran if Veteran Unable to Work Due to Service-Connected Disability

On Wednesday, January 9, 2013, Rep. Su Ryden introduced HB 13-1008 - Concerning the Extension of the Veterans’ Preference in State Hiring to the Spouse of a Veteran if the Veteran Is Unable to Work Due to a Military Service-Connected DisabilityThis summary is published here courtesy of the Colorado Bar Association’s e-Legislative Report.

The state constitution currently a veterans’ preference in state hiring (preference). If a numerical method is used for the comparative analysis of candidates, an applicant entitled to preference will have a specified number of points added to his or her score. If a non-numerical method is used, an applicant entitled to preference will be added to the interview eligible list. The surviving spouse of a veteran who would have been entitled to preference is also eligible for preference.

The bill extends the veterans’ preference to the spouse of a veteran who is eligible for preference but has a military service-connected disability and is unable to work. If a numerical method is used for the comparative analysis of candidates, five points shall be added to the comparative analysis score of the candidate. If a non-numerical method is used the candidate is added to the interview eligible list.

In keeping with the constitutional provisions regarding preference, a candidate is not eligible to receive preference with respect to a promotional opportunity. Assigned to the State, Veterans, & Military Affairs Committee.

U.S. Supreme Court Denies Review of Veterans’ Benefits Petition

On Monday, January 7, 2013, the Supreme Court of the United States denied a petition for review of a May Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals decision regarding the processing of medical benefits for veterans. The denial by the Court effectively affirms the Ninth Circuit’s decision that the judicial branch lacks authority to decide such appeals.

The case was originally brought by veterans’ advocacy groups in 2007.  After a bench trial in 2008, United States District Judge Samuel Conti concluded that the court did not have jurisdiction over the appeals, citing the Veterans’ Judicial Review Act and noting that the court lacked power to remedy the wrongs against veterans documented by “voluminous” evidentiary submissions to the court. Veterans for Common Sense v. Peake, 563 F. Supp. 2d 1049 (N.D. Ca. 2008). 

A panel of the Ninth Circuit overturned that decision in 2011, ordering that, because of the serious nature of the claims, veterans groups could ask the court to order changes in the system. Veterans for Common Sense v. Shinseki, 644 F.3d 845 (9th Cir. 2011). Upon request for a new hearing before a larger panel, however, that ruling was reversed.

The full panel of the Ninth Circuit determined that it did not have jurisdiction to hear the appeal.

[W]e lack jurisdiction to afford such relief because Congress, in its discretion, has elected to place judicial review of claims related to the provision of veterans’ benefits beyond our reach and within the exclusive purview of the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims and the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. . . . As much as we as citizens are concerned with the plight of veterans seeking the prompt provision of the health care and benefits to which they are entitled by law, as judges we may not exceed our jurisdiction.

Veterans for Common Sense v. Shinseki, 678 F.3d 1013, 1016 (9th Cir. 2012). In September, the plaintiff veterans organizations submitted a petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Supreme Court, asking the Court to rule on whether the Veterans Judicial Review Act allows veterans to challenge in federal court the systemic delays in the VA’s provision of mental health care and death and disability compensation. That petition was denied on Monday, January 7, 2013. Plaintiff group Veterans for Common Sense issued a statement in response to the denial, stating in part

We are deeply disappointed the Court did not hear the urgent plea of suicidal Veterans who face delays of months, and often years, seeking VA assistance.  Although significant improvements were made in some areas within VA, such as a suicide hotline set up after our lawsuit that rescued 23,000 distraught Veterans, the nation’s second largest department remains in deep crisis.

The Colorado Bar Association, in conjunction with several bar associations across the state, has established Colorado Lawyers for Colorado Veterans, a service where veterans can meet with an attorney regarding their legal issues free of charge. Attorneys wishing to assist with this program can contact Carolyn Gravit.

Eligibility for VA benefits and appeals processes will be discussed at the January 31, 2013 program, “Fundamentals of Practicing Before the Veterans’ Administration 2013.” This three-hour program will take place at 9 a.m. at the CLE offices. It qualifies for the VA three-hour training requirement for attorneys who wish to represent veterans before the Veterans’ Administration. Attorneys can attend for a significantly reduced rate by taking a pro bono case. Click here for registration information.

CLE Program: Fundamentals of Practicing Before the Veterans’ Administration 2013

This CLE presentation will take place on Thursday, January 31, 2013, at 9:00 a.m. Click here to register for the live program, and click here to register for the webcast.

Can’t make the live program? Click here to order the homestudy.

SJR 12-040: Colorado General Assembly Recognizes and Commends the CBA and the Veteran Trauma Court

On April 18, 2012, Sens. Kent Lambert and Brandon Shaffer and Reps. Mark Waller and John Soper issued Senate Joint Resolution (SJR) 12-040 – Concerning Service to Veterans by the Colorado Bar Association and the Veteran Trauma Court. This summary is published here courtesy of the Colorado Bar Association’s e-Legislative Report.

Be It Resolved . . . That the Colorado General Assembly recognizes and commends the Colorado Bar Association and the Veteran Trauma Court for their work providing assistance to our veterans and calls for a renewed commitment to supporting the growth of these important endeavors.

Summaries of featured bills can be found here.

SB 12-141: Modification of Occupancy Requirements for Home Loans In Order to Assist Deployed Soldiers in Purchasing Homes

On January 31, 2012, Sen. Brandon Shaffer introduced SB 12-141 – Concerning Measures to Alleviate Difficulties Faced by Military Personnel in Qualifying for Home Mortgage Loans. This summary is published here courtesy of the Colorado Bar Association’s e-Legislative Report.

The bill eases occupancy requirements for members of the United States armed services who are deployed on active federal service for a period in excess of 60 days and who desire to obtain loans to purchase residences into which they plan to move following a period of deployment. The bill passed 3rd Reading on March 2 in the Senate and now awaits committee assignment in the House.

Since this summary, the bill has been assigned to the House Judiciary Committee.

Summaries of other featured bills can be found here.

Colorado’s Justice Crisis

It’s a perfect storm.  Although overused, that metaphor so accurately captures what is happening with respect to Colorado’s legal aid delivery system that it is difficult to avoid.  Just as in a perfect storm, a rare combination of circumstances has resulted in a crisis of unprecedented magnitude.

Colorado Legal Services (CLS) is the only program in the state that provides free legal assistance (advice, brief service, and full representation) in civil matters to low-income individuals and families in every Colorado county.  With 14 offices around the state, it operates like a legal emergency room, serving low income Coloradans at greatest risk and in greatest need.  In 2010 alone, CLS provided assistance to over 11,000 indigent clients facing serious legal problems that directly implicated their health, safety, stability and sufficiency.  With few exceptions, CLS clients live at or below 125% of the federal poverty guideline (which translates to an annual income of $13,613 for an individual and $27,938 for a family of four).  They include senior citizens, victims of domestic violence, veterans, persons with mental and physical disabilities, and other particularly vulnerable Coloradans.

Even before the recession, the need for legal aid among the poor outstripped available resources.  A study in 2005 found that for every client served by CLS, at least one person seeking help was turned away because of insufficient resources.  The Great Recession and its aftermath have made the situation dramatically worse, as more and more low-income Coloradans experience the significant legal problems that accompany acute economic distress and prolonged unemployment.  With the deterioration of the labor and housing markets, rising fuel and food costs, and depleted savings, more Coloradans are facing eviction, foreclosure, delinquent child support, hunger, financial distress, bankruptcy, and domestic violence.  In addition, prolonged un- or under-employment means that the number of people eligible for legal aid continues to rise.  The most recent Census Bureau survey found that there are now over 750,000 Coloradans who are income-eligible for services.

Amidst this rising tide of need, CLS is experiencing devastating funding losses that threaten to compromise its ability to meet even the most serious legal needs of the poor.  Federal funding, with strong bipartisan support, has long been a financial foundation for legal aid.  Yet, notwithstanding the increased need for legal services and the value of those services in stabilizing families in crisis, just before Thanksgiving, Congress approved a budget bill for 2012 that includes a 14.85% cut in funding for legal aid programs such as CLS.  This translates into a loss for Colorado of over $605,000.

This latest reduction in federal funding comes on top of other funding losses suffered over the last two years totaling nearly $1 million.  Most notable among these is the drop in funding from COLTAF, the Colorado Lawyer Trust Account Foundation.  The extended period of very low interest rates that we are experiencing (now expected to continue until at least mid-2013) has decimated COLTAF’s revenue, which is comprised solely of the interest earned on lawyers’ trust accounts, and although COLTAF has a reserve, built in better times for just such times as these, it is rapidly being depleted.  Even with the reserve, COLTAF funding for CLS has dropped by $630,000 over the course of the last two years, and COLTAF is projecting another cut to CLS of at least $520,000 in 2012.

Also important is a loss of $165,000 in state funding for legal services for victims of domestic violence.  Whether the state will be in a position to restore that funding for fiscal year 2013 remains to be seen, but an actual increase in the state appropriation, and certainly one anywhere near the magnitude necessary to cover for other losses, is not in the cards, given the state’s current budget constraints.  All told, by the end of 2012, CLS will likely be down over $2 million, or more than 20% of its funding just two years ago.

All of these funding losses mean that CLS, already woefully understaffed, will shrink further, which will necessarily reduce the legal assistance available to low-income Coloradans, regardless of their legal need.  Already, where there were six CLS lawyers doing family law cases in the Denver metro area, which has an indigent population of nearly 300,000, now there will be only five;  where there were four lawyers handling evictions and other housing issues, three will have to suffice; and where there were three doing foreclosure defense, now there will be two.  Other parts of the state are faring no better.  In Grand Junction, with an indigent population in Mesa County of about 17,000, there are now only two CLS lawyers, where formerly there were three.  The CLS offices in Colorado Springs and Alamosa have each lost a paralegal, and the Durango office has lost the sole member of its support staff, leaving just three lawyers and a paralegal to serve the entire southwest corner of the state, including the Southern Ute and Ute Mountain Ute Indian Reservations.  This serious understaffing is only going to get worse.

Bar-sponsored pro bono programs alone cannot be expected to pick up this much slack, particularly since they too are suffering from cuts in their COLTAF funding.  Nor can the court system, also suffering from inadequate funding, be expected to seamlessly absorb ever larger numbers of pro se litigants, especially if timely legal assistance would have eliminated the need for them to be there in the first place.  It is true that to maximize access for those in greatest need, a well-functioning civil legal aid delivery system must have well-managed pro bono programs; it must have a legal community committed to providing pro bono services to the poor; it must have self-help resources that make courts and administrative agencies accessible for those who are proceeding pro se; and it must maximize its use of technology to improve access in rural areas and otherwise.  But the backbone of any well-functioning system must be an adequately-funded, staffed legal aid program, with lawyers and paralegals, who are expert in dealing with the problems unique to low-income populations, and who are available on demand when low-income families are in crisis and time is of the essence.

The legal profession has a singular responsibility to respond to this crisis in our civil justice system.  CLS is the place of last resort for low-income families, the disabled, veterans and military families, and seniors who are facing serious civil legal problems.  If turned away, these Coloradans are effectively denied the rights, remedies, and protections afforded by the law, sometimes with devastating consequences – lethal injuries at the hands of an abusive spouse, a home lost to an unscrupulous lender, life on the street because of a wrongful denial of disability benefits.  As lawyers, we understand that the rule of law is in jeopardy when the protections of the law are not available to increasingly large numbers of our most vulnerable citizens.

The leadership of lawyers – whether in private practice or in-house corporate counsel, large firm or solo practice, government or nonprofit – is more important than ever in fulfilling our nation’s promise of equal justice for all.  The effect of CLS’ funding losses is calculable in terms of dollars lost, staff positions eliminated, and additional applicants for service turned away.  But the actual impact on the lives of low-income Coloradans, the damage to our communities, the tarnishing of our nation’s fundamental promise of equal justice, and the risk to our civil justice system and the rule of law is immeasurable.

Here are some things you can do to help:

  1. Give generously to the Legal Aid Foundation (http://www.legalaidfoundation.org/).
  2. Take a pro bono case from Metro Volunteer Lawyers (http://www.metrovolunteerlawyers.org/).
  3. Speak to your elected representatives (federal and state) about the importance of public funding for civil justice.
  4. Speak with your banker to ensure that the interest rate on your COLTAF account is as generous as possible.
Diana Poole is the Executive Director of the Legal Aid Foundation, which raises money for Colorado Legal Services, and COLTAF, which administers Colorado’s IOLTA program. She is also a member of the Colorado Access to Justice Commission.

Colorado Lawyers Step Up for Colorado Veterans

 By Benjamin Currier & John Vaught

Access to justice for all Americans is an issue that is constantly evolving in an effort to meet the needs of those who cannot afford traditional legal services. With governmental budgets and outreach programs being pared, the communities that most rely on pro bono legal services are compelled to turn to individuals and to private initiatives to meet their ever-expanding need. Some groups have enjoyed success and are gaining access to justice through innovative means, but many have not. Among this latter group are our military veterans, active duty military personnel, and their families.

In an attempt to meet the needs of Colorado veterans and service members, the Colorado Bar Association is developing a statewide pro bono legal services initiative to provide legal service to Colorado veterans, some active duty service members, and their families— Colorado Lawyers for Colorado Veterans. This program is structured to provide free legal advice through clinics held around the state and also provide pro bono and low fee legal services to individuals who require further help.

Colorado Lawyers for Colorado Veterans will begin the first of many free clinics on Nov. 11 in Denver and Colorado Springs, and on Nov. 10 in Fort Collins.

It is estimated that one-third of the adult homeless population are veterans, and a vast number of other veterans also are in need of legal help but unable to afford and receive the assistance they desperately require. Many national reserve, retired, or otherwise discharged veterans do not have access to legal services. Active duty service members receive some assistance from the Judge Advocate General’s Corps; however, many still have legal issues and problems that are not met by the current active duty legal services and do not have the resources to afford legal services to solve their problems. Because of this, Colorado attorneys and the CBA are reaching out to help veterans with their legal needs and problems.

This program is consistent with the recommendations made by the Chief Justice Michael Bender, as part of the Chief Justice’s Commission on the Legal Profession. Modeled after a similar program in Texas, it is being led by a joint collaboration between the Commission, CBA President-elect Mark Fogg, John Vaught, CBA Young Lawyers Division Chair Benjamin Currier, CBA Executive Director Chuck Turner, and staff members of the DBA and CBA, including Carolyn Gravit, Heather Clark, and Denise Lynch.

The Denver event is scheduled to be held at the Bo Matthews Center, at 3030 Downing St., from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. This initial Denver event will be staffed by law students, young lawyers, and other Colorado attorneys. In addition to these volunteers, a Colorado-based service organization called Challenge America will be present to help guide veterans through the maze of other benefits available to them. This highly anticipated event is the first of many steps to try to serve the needs of Colorado veterans, one veteran at a time.

We are currently searching for volunteers to assist for future clinics across the state. We also are looking for individuals who are willing to take on pro bono and low fee cases to help veterans in need. If you are interested in helping, please contact Carolyn Gravit at cgravit@cobar.org. We look forward to seeing you and helping with this new and exciting effort to provide pro bono legal services to Colorado veterans and service members.

The Docket eFile brings features from your favorite Denver Bar Association publication to you digitally. When you see the logo, you’re reading an article from The Docket. You’ll also still be able to read the full issue online at denbar.org/docket.

Colorado Court of Appeals: Husband’s Military Temporary Disability Retired List Pay Must Be Excluded Before Dividing his Retirement Benefits Pursuant to Divorce Decree

The Colorado Court of Appeals issued its opinion in In re the Marriage of Poland on September 29, 2011.

Dissolution of Marriage—Military—Retirement Benefits—Temporary Disability Retired List.

In this post-dissolution of marriage action, husband appealed from the order awarding wife a portion of the pay he received from the military after he was placed on the temporary disability retired list (TDRL). The order was vacated and the case was remanded for further proceedings.

The parties’ marriage was dissolved in 2005. Their separation agreement, which was incorporated into the decree, provided that husband’s military retirement benefits were marital property and would be divided, on his retirement, under the HuntGallo formula. [See In re Marriage of Hunt, 909 P.2d 525 (Colo. 1995).] The agreement further provided that the parties intended to divide husband’s “gross military retirement” and that if husband elected to receive Veterans Administration (VA) disability benefits and his disposable retirement pay was thereby reduced, wife’s share of the benefits would not be reduced. When husband was placed on the TDRL in September 2009, the trial court ordered husband to pay wife her share of his TDRL earnings as determined under the decree.

Husband contended that the trial court erred by awarding wife a portion of his TDRL pay. A military service member is placed on the TDRL if the member has a disability rating of at least 30% but the disability has not yet been determined to be permanent. The Uniformed Services Former Spouses’ Protection Act precluded the trial court from dividing anything other than “disposable retired pay,” as defined in the statute. However, based on 10 U.S.C. § 1408(a)(4)(C) of the Act, an amount equal to the amount of TDRL pay, as calculated based on husband’s percentage of disability when he was placed on the TDRL, must be excluded from the marital property; any amounts in excess of that amount may be divided under the decree. Because the trial court divided all of husband’s TDRL pay under the time-rule formula without considering the extent to which the pay was computed on husband’s disability, the order was reversed. On remand, the trial court must determine and exclude husband’s TDRL pay before dividing husband’s retirement benefits pursuant to the decree.

This summary is published here courtesy of The Colorado Lawyer. Other summaries for the Colorado Court of Appeals on September 29, 2011, can be found here.

Denver Drug Court Opens a Special Track for Veterans

Earlier this month, the Denver Adult Drug Court implemented a Veterans Track within its existing problem-solving courts program. As a result, some military veterans charged with non-violent crimes may now have the opportunity to be enrolled in the court-monitored treatment and accountability program.

The drug court program was expanded to create the new track, which is designed to balance the specialized treatment needs of veterans with the need to protect the community’s safety. The goal is to provide non-violent offenders with effective treatment while still holding them accountable for their actions.

According to the press release from State Judicial, the National Association of Drug Court Professionals reports that one in six veterans returning from the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq suffer from a substance abuse challenge; one in five has symptoms of a mental disorder or cognitive impairment. Post-traumatic stress disorder can be an underlying factor in crimes allegedly committed by veterans and their subsequent involvement with the criminal justice system.

“The Denver Adult Drug Court once again is in the forefront in addressing the critical needs of vulnerable segments of our society,” said Denver District Court Chief Judge Robert S. Hyatt. “Providing a specialized court experience for veterans is a logical extension of the many services already available in the Denver Adult Drug Court.”

The new arm of the Denver Adult Drug Court is the second court program in Colorado specifically designed to address the needs of military veterans. A Veteran Trauma Court in the Fourth Judicial District, which serves El Paso and Teller counties, has been operating for two years with a similar goal and program.

Other new services provided to veterans have also been organized this month. The Colorado Bar Association is sponsoring Veterans’ Legal Clinics, which begin in November. Additionally, a new website has been created to connect local veterans with the people who want to help them resolve their legal issues.

For more information on Veterans Track program and the Veterans Trauma Court, contact Laura Williams, Colorado Department of Human Services, Division of Behavioral Health, at (303) 866-7433 or laura.williams@state.co.us.

Click here to read the full press release about the veterans track from State Judicial.

Veterans’ Legal Clinics to Start in November; New Website for Legal Services in Denver

The Colorado Bar Association is beginning a statewide effort to establish free legal clinics for veterans. The first clinics will be held in Denver and Colorado Springs on Veteran’s Day, November 11, and Fort Collins on November 10. Lawyers who are interested in volunteering to staff the “legal advice” clinics are needed for those locations, as well as others to be established in the future.

Additionally, lawyers will be needed to assist in taking on pro bono cases for those veterans needing representation. If you are interested in helping our veterans, please contact Heather Clark at hclark@cobar.org.

Also, a new website has been created to connect local veterans with the people who want to help them resolve their legal issues. Veterans Legal Services of Denver was founded by combat veterans and University of Denver Sturm College of Law students Dustin Charapata and Sean Marsh.

CLE: Drug, Sobriety, and Mental Health – Colorado’s New Problem Solving Courts

We’ve talked about Colorado’s problem solving courts here before (here, here and here). But did you know there are now more than fifty operational problem solving courts in sixteen Colorado jurisdictions? The courts are specifically tailored to consider particularized issues, and consist of adult drug courts, juvenile drug courts, mental health courts, family/dependency and neglect courts, truancy courts, prostitution drug court, and DWI courts.

The goal is to stress a collaborative, multidisciplinary, problem-solving approach to address the underlying issues of the individuals appearing in court, rather than simply focusing on the immediate legal matter brought before the court. There is close collaboration with the service communities in their jurisdictions, and the results have been proven to show long-term effectiveness. According to the Colorado Judicial Branch, seventy-five percent of drug court graduates remain arrest-free at least two years after leaving the program.

If you’re interested in learning more, join us for a CLE program to learn when and how you may use Colorado’s problem solving courts, rather than the traditional court setting, on behalf of your clients.

The CLE seminar, Drug, Sobriety and Mental Health Courts – Colorado’s New Problem Solving Courts, will be held on Thursday, March 31, 2011. It is available in a variety of formats, including live, live webcast, online video, MP3 download, audio CD, and video replay.

Protected

2013-05-18 10:00:45