July 18, 2019

Archives for October 20, 2016

CJD 05-01, “Directive Concerning Access to Court Records,” Amended by Colorado Supreme Court

On Tuesday, October 18, 2016, the Colorado Supreme Court adopted changes to Chief Justice Directive 05-01, “Directive Concerning Access to Court Records.” The changes to this Chief Justice Directive were proposed by the Public Access Committee, and they replace previous public access policies. The changes include clarification of wording that was causing confusion, a mandate that court records involving a child victim be redacted before being released to the public, inclusion of applications for public defenders, court-appointed counsel, or guardians ad litem as not accessible to the public, and changes to Appendix C for consistency purposes. The full Chief Justice Directive is available here.

Colorado Court of Appeals: Announcement Sheet, 10/20/2016

On Thursday, October 20, 2016, the Colorado Court of Appeals issued eleven published opinions and eleven unpublished opinions.

People v. Ortega

People v. Flores-Lozano

People v. Brown

People in Interest of T.B.

Perfect Place, LLC v. Semler

In re Marriage of Rooks

Martin v. Arapahoe County Court

Layton Construction Co., Inc. v. Shaw Contract Flooring Services, Inc.

Marshall v. Civil Service Commission of the City & County of Denver

Medved v. Colorado Department of Revenue

Sopris Lodging, LLC v. Schofield Excavation, Inc.

Summaries of these cases are forthcoming.

Neither State Judicial nor the Colorado Bar Association provides case summaries for unpublished appellate opinions. The case announcement sheet is available here.

Tenth Circuit: Kansas Law Requiring Documentary Proof of Citizenship Violates National Voter Registration Act

The Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals issued its opinion in Fish v. Kobach on Wednesday, October 19, 2016.

In this case, the Tenth Circuit resolved whether section 5 of the National Voter Registration Act (the “NVRA”), 52 U.S.C. § 20504, preempts a Kansas law requiring documentary proof of citizenship (“DPOC”) for voter registration, Kan. Stat. Ann. § 25-2309(l), as applied to the federally mandated voter-registration form that must be a part of any application to obtain or renew a driver’s license (the “motor voter” process). Section 5 of the NVRA mandates that states include a voter-registration form as part of the application for a driver’s license, and provides that this voter-registration form “may require only the minimum amount of information necessary to” prevent duplicate registrations and to “enable State election officials to assess the eligibility of the applicant and to administer voter registration and other parts of the election process.” 52 U.S.C. § 20504(c)(2)(B). Section 5 further mandates that motor voter forms include the following: a statement of the criteria for eligibility, “including citizenship”; an attestation that the applicant meets those criteria; and the applicant’s signature “under penalty of perjury.” § 20504(c)(2)(C).4

Granting a motion for a preliminary injunction against enforcement of Kansas’s DPOC requirements, the U.S. District Court for the District of Kansas held that the Plaintiffs-Appellees had made a strong showing that Kansas’s DPOC law was preempted by NVRA section 5, insofar as DPOC was more than the “minimum amount of information necessary” to achieve the purposes set forth by the statute. Defendant-Appellant Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach appealed from the district court’s entry of the preliminary injunction, which required him to register to vote any applicants previously unable to produce DPOC and to cease enforcement of Kansas’s DPOC requirement with respect to individuals who apply to register to vote at the Kansas Department of Motor Vehicles (“DMV”) through the motor voter process.

Exercising jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292, the Tenth Circuit held that the district court did not abuse its discretion in granting the preliminary injunction because the NVRA preempts Kansas’s DPOC law as enforced against those applying to vote while obtaining or renewing a driver’s license. Specifically, section 5 of the NVRA provides that the state motor voter form “may require only the minimum amount of information necessary to . . . enable State election officials to assess the eligibility of the applicant and to administer voter registration and other parts of the election process.” 52 U.S.C. § 20504(c)(2)(B)(ii). Section 5 also requires motor voter forms to include a signed attestation under penalty of perjury that the applicant meets the state’s eligibility criteria, including citizenship. § 20504(c)(2)(C). The Tenth Circuit held that this attestation under penalty of perjury is the presumptive minimum amount of information necessary for state election officials to carry out their eligibility-assessment and registration duties. As it pertains to the citizenship requirement, the presumption ordinarily can be rebutted (i.e., overcome) only by a factual showing that substantial numbers of noncitizens have successfully registered to vote under the NVRA’s attestation requirement. Having determined that Secretary Kobach failed to make this showing, the Tenth Circuit concluded that the DPOC required by Kansas law is more than the minimum amount of information necessary and, therefore, is preempted by the NVRA.

The Tenth Circuit affirmed the grant of a preliminary injunction.

Tenth Circuit: Unpublished Opinions, 10/19/2016

On Wednesday, October 19, 2016, the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals issued one published opinion and one unpublished opinion.

Young v. Renne

Case summaries are not provided for unpublished opinions. However, some published opinions are summarized and provided by Legal Connection.