August 19, 2018

Rule Changes Adopt Colorado Lawyer Self-Assessment Program, Amend Public Access and Water Court Rules

The Colorado Supreme Court has issued three new rule changes that have recently been released by the Colorado State Judicial Branch.

Rule Change 2018(08) amends Rules 11, 12, and 13 of the Uniform Local Rules for All State Water Court Divisions. Rule 11 was amended by the addition of a comment to specify that January 1, 2018, changes to the rule require expert witness disclosures to be made earlier than were previously required. Rule 12, “Procedure Regarding Decennial Abandonment Lists,” is new and sets forth specifications for publication and protest of decennial abandonment lists. Rule 13 was unchanged except to be renumbered; formerly, it was Rule 12.

Rule Change 2018(09) amends Rule 2 of Chapter 38 of the Colorado Rules of Civil Procedure, “Public Access to Information and Records.” Rule 2, “Public Access to Administrative Records of the Judicial Branch,” had minor amendments in sections 1 and 2. Section 3 of the rule dealing with exceptions and limitations on access to records had several amendments. The changes to Section 4 were relatively minor, and Section 5 was unchanged.

Rule Change 2018(10) adds Rule 256, “The Colorado Lawyer Self-Assessment Program,” to the Colorado Rules of Civil Procedure. Rule 256 establishes the Colorado Lawyer Self-Assessment Program and sets forth guidelines and definitions for compliance with the program. The rule specifies that lawyers who utilize the program will be subject to confidentiality and immunity.

For a complete list of the Colorado Supreme Court’s adopted and proposed rule changes, click here.

Rule Change 2018(07) Released, Amending Colorado Appellate Rules

On Friday, June 8, 2018, the Colorado State Judicial Branch released Rule Change 2018(07), adopted by the Colorado Supreme Court on June 7 and effective July 1, 2018. The rule change Form 8, “Designation of Transcripts,” in the Appendix to Chapter 32, and also amends Rules 21, 21.1, 49, 50, 51, 51.1, 52, 53, 54, 56 and 57.

While some of the changes are relatively minor, many of the rules were dramatically amended. A redline and a clean copy of the rule change is available here. Appellate practitioners are encouraged to familiarize themselves with the rule changes before their July 1 effective date.

For all of the Colorado Supreme Court’s adopted and proposed rule changes, click here.

Rules of Civil Procedure, JDF 601, and Form 4 Amended in Rule Changes 2018(05) and 2018(06)

On Thursday, April 12, 2018, the Colorado Supreme Court issued two rule changes. Rule Change 2018(05) amends Form 4, “Petition for Postconviction Relief Pursuant to Crim. P. 35(c),” and Rule Change 2018(06) amends Colorado Rule of Civil Procedure 16.1, “Simplified Procedure for Civil Actions,” and JDF 601, “District Court Civil Case Cover Sheet for Initial Pleading of Complaint, Counterclaim, Cross-Claim, or Third-Party Complaint and Jury Demand.”

The changes to C.R.C.P. 16.1 are extensive, and contain multiple changes to the first several subsections, including “Purpose of Simplified Procedure,” “Actions Subject to Simplified Procedure,” “Civil Cover Sheet,” “Motion for Exclusion from Simplified Procedure,” and more. There is also new Comment to the Rule that explains the reasoning for the changes.

For the full text of the 2018 rule changes, click here. For all of the court’s adopted and proposed rule changes, click here.

Colorado Rules of Civil Procedure Updated Regarding Legal and Judicial Education

On Tuesday, March 20, 2018, the Colorado State Judicial Branch released Rule Change 2018(04), adopted by the Colorado Supreme Court on March 15, 2018, and effective on July 1, 2018. The rule change adds C.R.C.P. 250 and amends C.R.C.P. 260, both rule sets titled “Mandatory Continuing Legal and Judicial Eduction.”

The new Rules 250.1 through 250.10 comprehensively define the continuing education requirements of lawyers and judges. The new rules make some changes from the previously enacted rules. Specifically, the definition of which activities will be accredited has been expanded, and now activities related to wellness, diversity, law practice management, leadership, professionalism, and more may qualify for accreditation.

Another major change enacted with the new rules is that lawyers are required to track compliance with CLE requirements until age 72. Lawyers who had previously aged out under the former limit of age 65 will now be required to continue tracking credits until they reach age 72, beginning with the effective date of the new rules (July 1, 2018).

The new rules also clarify that lawyers may receive CLE credit for certain pro bono activities, participation in the CAMP program, and mentoring. Attorneys who mentor can receive CLE credit for mentoring each year, while mentees can only receive CLE credit one time.

The former rules, codified at C.R.C.P. 260 through 260.8, were amended to reference the new rules, as appropriate.

For a redline of the rule change, click here. For all of the Colorado Supreme Court’s adopted and proposed rule changes, click here.

Rule Change 2018(03) Amends Colorado Rules of Professional Conduct

On Thursday, February 22, 2018, the Colorado Supreme Court issued Rule Change 2018(03), amending the Colorado Rules of Professional Conduct. Rule 5.4, “Professional Independence of a Lawyer,” and Rule 7.3, “Solicitation of Clients,” were amended in this rule change.

Rule 5.4(d) and (e) were amended to add the phrase, “that is authorized to practice law for a profit,” as follows:

(d) A lawyer shall not practice with or in the form of a professional company that is authorized to practice law for a profit, if:

* * *

(e) A lawyer shall not practice with or in the form of a professional company that is authorized to practice law for a profit except in compliance with C.R.C.P. 265.

Rule 7.3(c)(1) was amended to correct a typo, as follows:

(1) no such communication may be made if the lawyer knows or reasonably should know that the person to whom the communication is directed is represented resented by a lawyer in the matter; and

For a redline and clean version of Rule Change 2018(03), click here. For all of the Colorado Supreme Court’s adopted and proposed rule changes, click here.

Rules Governing Commissions on Judicial Performance Repealed

On Thursday, February 15, 2018, the Colorado Supreme Court issued Rule Change 2018(02), repealing Chapter 37 of the Colorado Rules of Civil Procedure, “Rules Governing the Commissions on Judicial Performance.” The repeal was adopted by the court on February 15, effective immediately.

For the text of the rule change, click here. For all of the Colorado Supreme Court’s adopted and proposed rule changes, click here.

Rule 41 of Colorado Rules of Criminal Procedure Amended in First Rule Change of 2018

The Colorado Supreme Court issued Rule Change 2018(01), amended and adopted by the court effective Thursday, January 11, 2018. The rule change affects Rule 41 of the Colorado Rules of Criminal Procedure, which deals with search, seizure, and confession. The amendments to the rule affect subsections (d)(5)(VI) and (VII). Subsection (d)(5)(VI) was amended to add information about the seizure of electronic media or electronically stored information:

(VI) A search warrant shall be executed within 14 days after its date. The officer taking property under the warrant shall give to the person from whom or from whose premises the property was taken a copy of the warrant and a receipt for the property or shall leave the copy and receipt at the place from which the property was taken. The return shall be made promptly and shall be accompanied by a written inventory of any property taken. The inventory shall be made in the presence of the applicant for the warrant and the person from whose possession or premises the property was taken, if they are present, or in the presence of at least one credible person other than the applicant for the warrant or the person from whose possession or premises the property was taken, and shall be verified by the officer. In a case involving the seizure of electronic storage media or the seizure or copying of electronically stored information, the inventory may be limited to describing the physical storage media that were seized or copied. The officer may retain a copy of the electronically stored information that was seized or copied. The judge upon request shall deliver a copy of the inventory to the person from whom or from whose premises the property was taken and to the applicant for the warrant.

Subsection (d)(5)(VII) is new and also addresses electronic media or electronically stored information:

(VII) A warrant under Rule 41(b) may authorize the seizure of electronic storage media or the seizure or copying of electronically stored information. Unless otherwise specified, the warrant authorizes a later review of the media or information consistent with the warrant. The time for executing the warrant in Rule 41(d)(5)(VI) refers to the seizure or on-site copying of the media or information, and not to any later off-site copying or review.

The rest of the rule is unchanged. For a redline and clean copy of the rule change, click here. For all of the Colorado Supreme Court’s adopted and proposed rule changes, click here.

Rule Change 2017(12) Issued, Amending Colorado Rules of Civil Procedure

On Thursday, December 7, 2017, the Colorado Supreme Court issued Rule Change 2017(12), amending the Colorado Rules of Civil Procedure.

Rule 16 was amended to reference new forms available to use when offering records of regularly conducted activity pursuant to CRE 902(11) and (12). The new forms, Form 37 and Form 38, were introduced, and Forms 10 and 11 were amended. These changes are effective immediately.

Rule 53, “Masters,” was introduced, effective January 1, 2018. The rule provides guidelines for the appointment of masters. Rule 121, § 1-15 was also amended effective January 1, 2018, to delete specific page requirements of briefs and instead refer to Rule 10(d), and also to add information about self-represented parties.

Finally, Rule 120, “Orders Authorizing Foreclosure Sale Under Power in a Deed of Trust to the Public Trustee,” was significantly amended. These changes are effective March 1, 2018.

A redline and clean copy of the rule change is available here. For all of the Colorado Supreme Court’s adopted and proposed rule changes, click here.

Colorado Appellate Rules Amended in Rule Change 2017(10)

On Wednesday, November 1, 2017, the Colorado State Judicial Branch announced Rule Change 2017(10), amending the Colorado Appellate Rules. Most of the changes are effective January 1, 2018, but the changes to Rule 30 are effective immediately.

The rule change revises Rule 10, “Record on Appeal,” in its entirety. The new 2018 Comment notes that Rule 10 contains the substance of Rule 11, which is to be deleted. Two new forms — Form 8, “Designation of Transcripts,” and Form 9, “Motion to Supplement the Record” — were adopted with the rule change. Rules 3.4 and 4.1 were amended to correct cross-references to former Rule 11 and replace them with the appropriate sections of new Rule 10.

Rules 5 and 12 had minor changes; in Rule 5, the word “record” was replaced with “transcripts,” and in Rule 12, a reference to the filing provisions of Rule 11 was deleted. Rule 30 also had a minor change; a reference to ICCES was changed to “Colorado Courts e-Filing.”

For the full redline and clean version of Rule Change 2017(10), click here. For all of the Colorado Supreme Court’s adopted and proposed rule changes, click here.

Rule 8.4 of Colorado Rules of Professional Conduct Amended in Rule Change 2017(09)

On Thursday, September 28, 2017, the Colorado Supreme Court released Rule Change 2017(09), amending Rule 8.4 of the Colorado Rules of Professional Conduct. Rule 8.4 addresses attorney misconduct. The change to the rule only involves subsection (c), which is amended by the addition of a clause to clarify that attorneys may advise, direct, or supervise others in lawful investigatory activities:

(c) engage in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation, except that a lawyer may advise, direct, or supervise others, including clients, law enforcement officers, or investigators, who participate in lawful investigative activities;

The rule change is effective immediately. A redline and clean copy of the rule change is available here. All of the Colorado Supreme Court’s adopted and proposed rule changes are available here.

Colorado Rules of Criminal Procedure Amended in Rule Change 2017(08)

On Monday, September 11, 2017, the Colorado Supreme Court issued Rule Change 2017(08), amending Rules 4 and 9 of the Colorado Rules of Criminal Procedure. The rule change is effective immediately.

Rule 4 addresses warrant and summons issuance upon filing of a felony complaint. Rule 9 addresses warrant or summons issuance upon indictment or information. The changes to the two rules are similar. The amended rules generally address procedures for issuing warrants or summonses in criminal matters, changing phrasing in many instances but retaining the substance of the rules. The rules were also changed to update information to gender-neutral pronouns.

A redline and clean copy of Rule Change 2017(08) is available here. For all of the Colorado Supreme Court’s adopted and proposed rule changes, click here.

Rule 16 of Colorado Rules of Criminal Procedure Amended by Colorado Supreme Court

On Thursday, August 24, 2017, the Colorado State Judicial Branch announced Rule Change 2017(07), amending Colo. R. Crim. P. 16. The changes to Crim. P. 16 amend the prosecution’s discovery requirements, as follows:

(c) Cost and Location of Discovery.

(1) The prosecution’s costs of providing duplicating any material discoverable material electronically to the defense, electronically or otherwise, under this rule shall be funded as set forth in section 16-9-702(2), C.R.S.paid from funds allocated by the general assemblyborne by the party receiving the material, based on the actual cost of copying the same to the party furnishing the material. The prosecution Copies of any discovery provided to a defendant by court appointed counsel shall nototherwisecharge for discoverybe paid for by the defendant. For any materials provided to the prosecution as part of the defense discovery obligation, the cost shall be borne by the prosecution based on the actual cost of duplication. Copies of any discovery provided to a defendant by court appointed counsel shall be paid for by the defendant.

(2) The place of discovery and furnishing of for materials not capable of being provided electronically shall be at the office of the party furnishing it, or at a mutually agreeable location.

The rule change is effective August 24, 2017. For the complete text of the rule change, click here. For all of the Colorado Supreme Court’s adopted and proposed rule changes, click here.